n this section you will find reviews of zoos outside Europe — date of visit is provided. Every zoo’s description starts with a brief history in a separate tab. To support the descriptions pictures and video footage are provided when available. For those who want more detailed information about a particular zoo a file is available with contact details, number of species, involvement in endangered species programmes and more. To find a particular zoo you can either browse the list, use the filter or follow the link on the map.
↓ Zoos which are visited and reviewed. Please pick a zoo and follow the link. ↓
Hanoi Zoo is founded on 6 August 1976 by the Hanoi People’s Committee. The Zoo is run by the Hanoi Zoological Gardens institution which is state owned and part of the Transportation and Urban Public Works Service of Hanoi city government. The Zoological Gardens institution takes care of several city gardens including Thu Le park where the Zoo is located.
Previously known as Bachthao Gardens, the name was changed when the zoological collection was relocated to Thu Le Park in 1976. The current site covers an area of 24 hectares, including the 6 ha lake. The lake is used for leisure activities such as pedal boats, while the park features several children playgrounds as well.
Due to the Voi Phuc (kneeling elephants) temple in the western part of the grounds Hanoi Zoo is regarded by some a pilgrim’s destination. This temple is associated with the Ling Lang legend (a famous national Vietnamese legend), because it is allegedly built to worship Saint Ling Lang who defeated the Chinese enemy. Therefore Hanoi Zoo is also a Historic Heritage site.
When the animal collections was introduced in Thu Le Park it comprised around 300 specimens of just 35 species. Nowadays (2016) the collection has expanded to roughly 650 specimens of over 90 different species. In addition to expanding the zoological collection the Zoo has worked together with Hanoi city government to further develop the grounds and facilities over the years. Step by step they improved the enclosures to increase the welfare of the animals kept captive. Their ultimate goal was to get the facilities as well as the expertise of the people working in the Zoo up to modern standards, and bring it on par with other zoos worldwide. This also made them rethink about the animal collection, because conservation of endangered species became paramount.
This was reflected in the mission that was adopted, which included objectives that are common for every modern self-respecting zoo, such as (a) the conservation and breeding of rare and endangered species, both native and non-native; (b) provision of an environment where researchers can conduct studies; © education of the visitors about animals and conservation; and (d) the design and construction of modern enclosures. Odd as it may seem for western perspectives they also set a goal for themselves to reproduce some domestic animals and to sell ornamental plants. And of course a visit to Hanoi Zoo had to be a relaxed outing. So, the conservation and protection of wildlife and the provision of a beautiful zoological garden for the people to enjoy were considered the most important targets.
The latter, therefore, made entertainment an important issue. For people used to zoos in Europe and North America this kind of ‘merry-go-round-entertainment’ in zoos is totally out of character for modern western zoos. However, this is common practice in Asian zoos, with most of the time the entertainment being overwhelmingly present, sound included. In Hanoi they even had an animal circus on the premises, which of course is unacceptable from the animal’s point of view as it impairs the animal’s welfare. So, they had to rethink the issue of entertainment as well. Especially the animal circus, because this clearly introduced animal welfare problems in the Hanoi Zoo establishment, while their intention was to do the right thing for these animals — at least based on their mission statement. Fortunately, Hanoi Zoo took their mission serious and quietly shut down the animal circus in 2016. Not the least due to the agreement the Zoo signed with Animals Asia, an animal rights organisation, in 2014.
As the Zoo has been a member of SEAZA (South East Asian Zoo Association) since 1993, more and more emphasis was placed over time on conservation of endangered species ex-situ as well as in-situ. Quite a few species of the Zoo’s animal collection are listed in the Red Data Book for Vietnam, including the Indochinese tiger, clouded leopard, Asian golden cat (Catopuma temminckii), Owston’s palm civet, Vietnamese pheasant, Crested Argus (Rheinardia ocellata) and the Asian Elephant. Hanoi Zoo is involved in several captive-breeding programmes of these Red Data Book species, but for example also for the Tam Dao newt, which is only found in a few places in Vietnam and has become one of the most endangered species of the world. Many of those species have been bred successfully in Hanoi. As is the Edwards’s pheasant, for which the Zoo established a long-time relationship with the World Pheasant Association and plays a significant role in its breeding programme.
Hanoi Zoo teamed up with several other non-governmental organisations including zoos to further improve the living conditions of the animals, the contribution to breeding programmes and its operational activities in general. As a result the Zoo’s elephants were finally free to roam their enclosure in 2015, after years of being chained. In addition to assisting the unchaining of elephants, Animals Asia and its partners have also been informing zoo carers about the benefits of enrichment for their animals to help provide them with daily stimulation, and working with zoo staff to provide new enclosure furnishings. This included climbing platforms for bears and tigers that have helped reduce fighting. Beyond that the clouded leopards now have multiple structures, levels and pathways. Meanwhile the macaques have been given bamboo perches, hammocks, swings and puzzle feeders to keep minds and bodies active.
As creating a research environment was part of their mission statement, the Zoo has set up several projects to study animal behaviour, supporting the design of better enrichment features, as shown in the video, and animal diets. Other research projects aim at improved control of contagious diseases, together with the Veterinary faculty of the Hanoi university.
The Zoo is important in the governmental fight against illegal trade of endangered animals by providing shelter and care of confiscated animals.
Educational programmes to provide wildlife information and create awareness among the general public about the importance of wildlife conservation are under development [2018]. This includes designing new information panels at enclosures, while they envisage to start with lectures for school groups.
Apparently there are plans for building a new zoo in Hanoi, the Me Tri-Trung Van Animal Park. This zoo should show the difference between in-situ and ex-situ living conditions of animals, in other words it should represent a situation of how animals live in the wild. Although the original idea was to open the new wildlife park in 2010, the plans haven’t materialised yet, in 2018.
(Source: Hanoi Zoo website; Animals Asia website, Hanoi Zoo closes its animal circus, 17.02.2016; Travelfish website, Vietnam forum, accessed 22.12.2018)
Although I haven’t had the time to acclimatise to the hot and humid weather conditions in Hanoi, I decide to pay Hanoi Zoo a visit the day after my arrival. To avoid the most extreme heat of the day I get a taxi early in the morning. It brings me to the nondescript entrance near Nguyễn Văn Ngọc where I don’t get a map of the zoo grounds nor any other explanatory folder or fact sheet. After making my way through the gate my first thoughts are that I didn’t pay enough attention and that the taxi driver brought me to an entertainment park neighbouring the Zoo. Directly after the entrance a small amusement park appears, and as it turns out there are more to come. However, a few metres from the loud noise-making equipment and screaming children an animal enclosure is situated. So, I did arrive at the Zoo, no doubt about it.
I haven’t visited many zoos in Asia yet, and forgot how Dusit Zoo in Bangkok had many children playgrounds on the premises as well, several of them with loud music. But as a mitigating circumstance in my favour, the only other Asian zoo I visited, Delhi Zoo, had almost no playgrounds available.
Although Hanoi Zoo strives for better living conditions for the animals and bring it on par with other zoos worldwide (see history) they definitely haven’t succeeded yet with the row of enclosures that start at the merry-go-round where I begin my tour. The first exhibit lacks an information panel. Therefore, you must have some knowledge to recognise that the female bear with cubs are Asian black bear. As a zoo that wants to raise awareness among the general public about biodiversity and conservation the lack of an information panel is a bad performance of course. Fortunately, the next-door enclosure provides information on the clouded leopard that can be seen. What kind of information I do not know, because it is only in Vietnamese, except for the English and scientific name of the species. This is a shame, but understandable. Other species housed in this row of similar enclosures are two Amur tigers, two sun bears, an Indochinese tiger, more Asian black bear, and a single male African lion. Besides the size of the enclosures — or should I say large cages of concrete and metal bars — they are absolutely not fit for purpose taking into account the lack of vegetation and the constant exposure because there is no shelter whatsoever. Further to this, the number of enrichment features is low. Especially, the clouded leopard and African lion have nothing more at their disposal as a small elevated platform in one corner and a small pool. Keeping a clouded leopard as a single specimen is quite understandable, because this elusive animal roams the jungle on its own, and male clouded leopards are notorious for killing the female when brought together for mating. But the mere fact that this animal is considered a ghost and is hardly ever seen in the wild makes it heartbreaking to see it here in Hanoi Zoo lying on a concrete floor without any opportunity to hide. In addition to the lack of artificial enrichment, the male lion being housed on its own without lionesses is unacceptable, because in nature this species lives in a pride. Since 2014, improvements have been introduced when the Zoo signed an agreement with AnimalsAsia, an animal rights organisation, to help providing new enclosure furnishings for daily stimulation of the animals. This included feeding the tigers and lion with meat via a cable to be reached by jumping only, and wooden climbing platforms for bears and tigers that have helped reduce fighting. According to information on AnimalsAsia’s website1 there should be multiple structures, levels and pathways for the clouded leopards. Unfortunately, I haven’t seen any of these enrichments for the clouded leopard.
From this carnivore section, opposite the lion cage, I catch a glimpse of an elephant and while walking towards the lake I see they keep three Asian elephants, all three in a separate enclosure. These paddocks are worrisome small, and only one comprises a pool, but luckily the elephants may freely roam their paddock area nowadays. Until 2015 the elephants were chained at their ankles and could hardly move at all. At present, the Zoo’s elephants are being rotated so that all three of them are receiving time in all areas of their enclosure. Enrichment items are present such as tyres on chains in hanging rows with food inside them and this, according to a visit report of Yorkshire Wildlife Park staff2, established new vitality among the pachyderms.
The elephants’ neighbours, the black crested gibbons (Nomascus concolor), are housed in a large cage with a tiled floor that emphasises the unnatural environment of these primates. The bare cage contains some enrichment, several ropes and trunks, but this doesn’t allow the gibbons to express their natural behaviour, not even close. Gibbons’ natural habitat is in the canopy of the tropical rainforest, and unfortunately the only features of the rainforest available here are the hight temperature and humidity. Next-door, in an even worse exhibit, four of another critically endangered gibbon species — the northern white-cheeked gibbons (Nomascus leucogenys) — spend their days in awful conditions. Meanwhile I am sweating like a pig in this heat with a ‘feels like’ temperature of about 40 °C.
Moving away from the lakeside again, I arrive at a carnivore facility with a design that is more inspired than the uniform row of concrete sections I’ve seen just after the entrance. This one is dedicated to Indochinese tigers (Panthera tigris ssp. Corbetti). Although the habitat that is provided is still not always very natural, because concrete trumps vegetation here as well, the six enclosure of this facility are asymmetric and more varied in design. Some of the enclosures that are situated around the indoor facilities, which are not accessible to the public, can even compete in size with those in more modern zoos. It is an effort of Hanoi Zoo to upgrade this exhibit to meet modern standards. And it seems that the tigers are rather comfortable with their situation, because the Zoo has seen at least 6 litters born since 2002 with a survival rate of 40%, while in nature the survival rate of Indochinese cubs is about 30%. The Zoo boasts this reproduction successes, and probably rightly so.
The hippopotamus or Hà mã in Vietnamese has a dedicated section with a hut erected in concrete and outdoor paddocks for 60% made of concrete, including the pools. These pools have either no water or just barely enough to allow a total submerge. Nevertheless two were underwater when I was watching the first time.
Another noise-making children’s playground is neighbouring these hippo facilities. This playground has got electrical trains in all sorts of design together with a merry-go-round, pony riding, a candy shop and a souvenir shop. I am not able to identify any kind of educational information or educational tool whatsoever, which means the Zoo has plenty of effort to make to fulfil their mission educating the visitor about animals and conservation. And starting with the young visitors is a good approach.
Then a series of enclosures for hoofed animals follows. First I see two Przewalski horses in a terrible small sandy paddock. Two doesn’t make a herd, while keeping such animals in a social structure is important to let them develop normal behaviour. The same counts for the two plains zebra (Equus quagga, or burchelli) in the adjacent paddock. Next a relatively large enclosure, compared to the previous ungulate enclosures, appears which houses domestic goat and Sika deer. So, this is the first mixed-species exhibit. Visitors do feed the animals, or at least try to do so, with whatever they brought or think is suitable, and to me this seem snot to be discouraged.
Back to the enclosures close to the lakeside. A few steps from the gibbons there’s a row of cage-like exhibits for small predators with leopard cat, masked palm civet and common palm civet. These exhibits all have window panes on ground level to separate the animals from the public, although this seems redundant, because the public fence is at such a distance from the exhibit itself that physical contact is impossible, but history may have proved otherwise. In a separate enclosure there supposed to be an Asian golden cat (Catopuma temminckii), but I fail to see this beautiful felid. All these four species have trunks for enrichment and high level resting posts. In the next separate exhibit a binturong shows that I am not the only mammal suffering from the weather conditions — it is panting enormously.
Then I switch sides again to have a look at the enclosure a bit further away from the lakeside passed the restaurant with annoying loud music. In a straightforward paddock with sandy substrate the typical stone building reminds of the giraffe that was once kept in Hanoi Zoo. And although the giraffe is still depicted on the Zoo maps that can be found on the premises, the enclosure is now inhabited by greater kudu and gemsbok (Oryx gazella), while the building provides shade and serves as their night quarters. Their next-door neighbours, the sambar deer, have a larger paddock at their disposal and they enjoy a bit of shadow provided by trees. Leaving the ungulate section and walking to the square near the main entrance I am a bit ambiguous about the ring-tailed lemur enclosure I pass along the way. On the one hand I am pleased that the walk-through lemur exhibit has not arrived yet in Hanoi, because I am not in favour of close encounters between ignorant public and zoo animals in general, and I expect such encounters when applied in Vietnamese zoos would lead to destructive effects to both animal and visitor. On the other hand the enclosure for the lemurs is simply too small and simple for this species to express normal behaviour.
The part of the Zoo near the main entrance starting at the square with the fountain focusses on domestic and exotic birds with a variety of aviary design, some offering shelter for a mix of species, others for a single species. None of the aviaries are very pleasing to the eye, but that is of minor importance of course. More vital is whether or not the aviaries provide good living conditions for the birds. For that matter I believe the bird exhibits here in Hanoi Zoo are not worse than many other aviaries I have seen elsewhere in the world. Most of them are too small in my honest opinion, although there are exceptions like in Doué-la-Fontaine Zoo and San Diego Zoo for example. But the essential conditions are provided, including shade, although it sometimes just has a makeshift appearance. In addition to all these flying birds, there’s a large paddock for four ostriches, and an open top reptile section with the critically endangered Siamese crocodile. And last but not least another almost full-size amusement park provides the necessary entertainment for when the Vietnamese children are getting bored ? — complete with carousels and bumper cars.
After the carnivores, the hoofed animals, the odd primate (gibbon and lemur) and the birds it is time to check out the other primates they keep. Therefore I enter the artificial island in the lake. The island could be regarded as a macaques island, because all the primates kept here belong to the Macaca genus, Rhesus monkey, stump-tailed macaque, pig-tailed macaque, crab-eating macaque and Assam macaque. It brings a bit of a relief, because the trees on the island provide the shade I need so badly. It is here that I am aware of the rubbish on the ground, such as potato chips packages, candy wrappers, plastic bottles and broken surgical masks, while there are plenty of rubbish bins available on the premises. Due to the ‘free distribution’ of rubbish it is also found in the primates enclosures, unfortunately, which led to footage I rather would not have shot (see video). All of the monkey exhibits — better call them cages because they are not much more than upgraded cages — have a similar construction with tiled floors, double wire mesh fences all around (including the roof), a night shelter and some enrichment features. The public fence is only about 70 centimetres away from the cage fence, which means that physical contact is possible. Despite the signs that say ‘do not come close’ the obvious happens of course. People hand feed to the monkeys, such as a banana, which is drawn into the cage by the primate with brute force.
It is very striking that I have seen only one non-Asian person while touring the Zoo grounds, all others are Vietnamese parents with their children. Why, I ask myself? But the answer is probably that this is by far the worst zoo I visited yet!
Hanoi Zoo is advertised as one of the progressive zoos in south-east Asia, and is a member of SEAZA (South East Asian Zoos Association). However, an amazing amount of fences are visible in the Zoo, and it is absolutely not on par with other zoos worldwide. The idea of barrier-free exhibits or immersion exhibits has not been introduced yet, and education of the general public needs to be enhanced. So, when one decides visiting zoological facilities in this region, it is important to bear in mind that even a progressive zoo like Hanoi Zoo lags behind. It can lead to quite a disappointment when your benchmark is focussed on zookeeping in Europe, USA or Canada.
1 — Hanoi Zoo closes its animal circus; AnimalsAsia website, 17.02.2016
2 — Staff visit to Hanoi Zoo, an update from Colin Northcott, november 2017; Yorkshire Wildlife Park Foundation
Here you see a macaque exploring the possible use of something that probably was handed to him by visitors through the fence of its enclosure, a broken surgical mask. You see those being used by people in public in East Asia. The background noise level is typical and even quite low at this part of Hanoi Zoo, because most of the kids entertainment facilities, such as electrical trains and merry-go-rounds are situated in other sections of the Zoo. You wonder where the elastic bands of the mask have gone.
In 1994, it was believed that the Edwards’s pheasant (Lophura edwardsi) was extinct in the wild, although there was a sizeable captive population in captivity, descended mainly from a small group of birds brought to Europe in the 1920s. Currently the Edwards’s pheasant is classified as Critically Endangered by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. The World Pheasant Association (WPA) had been working closely with Hanoi Zoo and providing a lot of training and support for their pheasant breeding programmes. WPA in the UK decided to offer 4 pairs of captive Edwards’s pheasants to Hanoi Zoo so that the species could at least be seen in its homeland. The birds survived well and bred regularly, enabling interesting comparisons to be made between the recently discovered Vietnamese Pheasant (Lophura hatinhensis) and the Edwards’s. More importantly, when a male Edwards was captured in the wild and eventually taken to Hanoi Zoo, there were females available for him to breed with.
The DNA from this male and his progeny form an extremely important part of WPA’s current DNA research into this species, which has again been suggested may be extinct in the wild. This DNA research will determine which birds within the captive population are the most useful for any reintroduction or reinforcement programme.
Since the Zoo is involved with multiple breeding programmes for endangered, endemic species of pheasants it has a good relation with the World Pheasant Association. Together with Birdlife International and the IUCN Species Survival Commission the World Pheasant Association established the Pheasant Specialist Group to conserve the species of pheasants all over the world. The Hanoi Zoo plays a significant role in this matter.
(Source: website World Pheasant Association, Vietnam, accessed 22.12.2018; Wikipedia)
Hanoi Zoo is located in Thu Le Park. There are several parks with animal facilities in Hanoi. So, when asking for directions or when asked for directions by for instance your taxi driver, make sure there’s full understanding about the exact location. Thu Le Park is very easy to get to following Kim Ma Road until the end, right beside the renowned Hanoi Daewoo Hotel. The park can be approached by both of its gates, the main entrance on Buoi Road (Đường Bưởi) and the other one to be reached from Nguyễn Văn Ngọc. In addition, just around the corner from the main entrance there’s another brand new entrance situated at Đường Cầu Giấy. This is a modern entrance with turnstiles, but not in use yet due to ongoing road maintenance at time of visit (May 2018).
Address:
Thu Le
Ba Dinh district
Hanoi
Viet Nam
The easiest way by bus is catching Hanoi Bus No. 9 (read more about Hanoi Bus here), especially when you stay around Hoan Kiem Lake. A good way to sort out your bus route, including changes, is by using the MOOVIT website, which apparently is also available as an app for Android and iOS systems.
Taxi is probably the best types of transportation for tourists, but as mentioned above, make sure there’s full understanding about the exact location the taxi driver should take you.
When you want to blend in you hire a moped or catch a moped driver to take you to the Zoo. And if you like a good challenge you try to hire a bicycle and hope for the best. Anyway, your respiratory system might suffer a little damage when you go out in the open among all those polluting mopeds and other transport vehicles on Hanoi roads.
There’s no bike rack available, but for either your bicycle or moped you will see where to park it as soon as you arrive ?, especially at the main entrance.
I wouldn’t recommend to go to the Zoo by (rental) car, unless you have previous experience driving in a major Asian city and feel confident doing so again.
There is no car park.
New Zealand’s oldest surviving zoo was established in 1906 after a group of residents petitioned the Wellington City Council to establish a Zoo for the people of Wellington. This petition coincided with the offer to the city of a young lion by the name of “King Dick” (named after Prime Minister Richard Seddon) by the Bostock and Wombwell Circus. King Dick was officially the Zoo’s first animal. King Dick was soon joined by llama, emus and kangaroos to form the foundation of the Zoo, initially housed in the Wellington Botanical Gardens. The collection was moved to Newtown Park, the Zoo’s present location, in 1907. The collection of animals grew continuously, with for instance two axis deer and six Himalayan thar donated by the duke of Bedford, president of the Zoological Society of London, in 1908. Other donations, from other zoos and private collections, followed and by 1912, Wellington Zoo housed over 500 animals. King Dick was presented with a female companion, which led to lion cubs born in 2013. Other species on display in that year included camel (which visitors could ride), sea lion, capuchin monkey and dingo. Over the next 30 years, with support of the Wellington Zoological Society the Zoo new animals were acquired and new enclosures built or improved. The first tigers arrived in 1923 and the first elephants in 1927, while two moated bear enclosures with concrete walls were constructed in 1929 and 1931. The Zoo records show that in the 1920s, besides the Tasmanian devil, the now extinct Tasmanian tiger or Thylacine was part of the animal collection as well.
During WWII zoo development stopped temporarily, because several zookeepers joined the armed forces. Nevertheless things were picked up after the war where they were left earlier. The primate section grew with the arrival of a young Muller’s grey gibbon (Hylobates muelleri) in December 1949, who became the first zoo’s longest serving resident — to be trumped by a tuatara at a certain point in the future of course — as well as the world’s oldest gibbon when he died in 2008. In 1956, as a part of the Zoo’s 50th anniversary celebrations, three female chimpanzees arrived from London Zoo. This must have been the reason that they introduced tea parties with the chimps afterwards. Like in London zoo the tea parties were very popular with the public.
The last tea party was in February 1970, four years after Koenraad Kuiper became Zoo director. After World War II Kuiper emigrated to New Zealand because he couldn’t find a suitable job in the Netherlands. More remarkably, his father had been director of Rotterdam Zoo (Diergaarde Blijdorp) before and during the war. Kuiper senior had been a strong opponent of using zoo animals for entertainment of the public. This might have influenced the ideas of the son, and together with the new era of zoo development and husbandry this led to an end of the chimp tea parties. Today, Wellington Zoo’s chimpanzees live in a large outdoor park and new indoor home, which was completed in 2007.
In the 1970s a revival of interest in New Zealand’s indigenous species, such as the kiwi and tuatara led to the opening of the Zoo’s first nocturnal house in 1975.
The four elephants the zoo housed during its existence, provided entertainment to the public by offering rides on their back. New insights in animal behaviour, elephants should be ideally kept in herds of 4 – 5 as they are very social animals, and zoo objectives led to the decision in 1983 to that the zoo had neither the space nor the resources to keep elephants.
In the 1980s many old-fashioned concrete and barred cages were demolished and replaced by enclosures of modern design, while for the animal collection more attention was paid to endangered species instead of the many common species they had on display. Hence, species such as snow leopard, giraffe, sun bear, lemur, white-cheeked gibbon and Sumatran tigers joined the collection. In addition, breeding programmes were initiated for kiwi and tuatara. The next decade saw the launch of a total overhaul of the Zoo, but due to an economic recession this couldn’t be pursued and finalised. Nevertheless, it did deliver a brand new entrance building, which also housed a new zoo school, a gift shop and administrative quarters. December 1998 the exhibit called Tropical River Trail was opened which followed the newest design standards for enclosures to provide visitors a special experience by habitat immersion. This part starting directly after the entrance, including the primate islands, still exists, but lost the name Tropical River Trail.
A new major redevelopment started in 2002 followed by a grand opening of the new Asia section, a sponsored project, in September 2012. The Asia section includes the new Malayan Sun Bear exhibit, as well as the redeveloped Sumatran Tiger exhibit. On 22 October 2015 the final project of that redevelopment programme, Meet the Locals — celebrating New Zealand’s native species, was opened to the public. The brand new kea aviary walk-through experience, however, was completed and populated in 2017.
The Zoo is a not for profit charitable trust, and has been that way since 2003. The Trust runs the Zoo on behalf of Wellington City Council — the Zoo’s principal funder.
(Source: Wellington Zoo website (accessed 2002); Wellington Zoo annual reports; Encyclopedia of the World’s Zoos (ed. C.E. Bell, 2001); website The Animal Facts (accessed 25.12.2017); Wikipedia; ‘Het huis met de leeuwen’ by Tania Heimans, 2015)
After a short bus ride from downtown Wellington I arrive at the Zoo in Newtown, the suburb that is located in the hills Wellington is built on. Together with neighbouring Newtown Park the Zoo is part of a green belt that runs over these hills at this side of town. It has been sixteen years since my previous visit to Wellington Zoo and I expect to see a lot of changes, although I doubt if my recollection of that visit is spot on.
Anyway, the Asian small-clawed otter enclosure and the gibbon island directly after the entrance are exactly how I remember it. Especially the island for the white-cheeked gibbons and the island for the brown capuchins and spider monkeys (black-handed as well as white-fronted) provide a naturalistic habitat with plenty of vegetation, although a few really large trees would make at least the two gibbons (male and female) happy I think, for allowing them to brachiate through the treetops. Now they have to include the ropes and wooden poles in their rush through the exhibit. The water-filled moat around both the islands is being supervised by Australian pelican, as police officers in their black-and-white plumage.
Opposite the gibbon island the nocturnal house, called The Twilight, houses kiwi and tuatara. It is basically a walk-through exhibit where you can see, if your eyes are up to it, the Zoo’s three male North Island brown kiwi and two of their tuatara. The latter are sometimes called ‘living fossils’, as they are the only living members of an ancient order of reptile that evolved millions of years ago. Tuatara live their lives in the ‘slow lane’ and can grow very old. People think they can become 100 and more. The oldest Tuatara at the Zoo is over 50 years old. Two of the tuatara are trained as contact animals, which means that there’s a chance you can meet them around the Zoo somewhere while handled by a Visitor Ranger.
Another mixed-species exhibit is situated on the same side of the footpath as The Twilight, opposite the other primate island. Bolivian squirrel monkey together with agouti are kept in what I would call a semi-closed exhibit, meaning that the animals are separated from the visitors on the lower part by glass, while the upper part consists of wire mesh. Separated from the squirrel monkey the building also has cotton-top tamarin on display.
Next I pass the Green Zoo — an interactive exhibit that explains about being responsible and sustainable considering your impact on the environment — and have a look at the area dedicated to New Zealand’s native species, Meet the Locals it is called or He Tuku Aroha in Maori language. This section was opened on 22 October 2015 and is designed for visitors to experience what New Zealand is like. The small footpath winds uphill along wild and domestic indigenous species such as little blue penguin (Eudyptula minor), Finnish Landrace sheep, kunekune pig, weta and ends at the kea walk-through aviary that is still under construction and due for opening in 2017.
The Zoo acts as a rescue centre for the world’s smallest penguin they keep at Penguin Point near the entrance of this NZ area. None of them have been born in captivity, but each was rescued from a life-threatening situation in the wild, either eye-related issues or flipper trauma due to being tangled badly in fishing gear. This impaired their hunting abilities and thus survival in the wild. They are well taken care of as they have access to a nice pool with vegetation on the banks that resembles the vegetation along New Zealand’s coastline. The boat that services as shelter is perhaps a bit overdone, although in the wild the birds may seek shelter at night under boats that lie on the shore.
The Farm with the sheep and kunekune pigs, but also with bees, rabbits, and chickens, has a barn area where visitors can learn more about how we rely on animals for products like wool, honey, meat and milk. There’s also a regenerating bush in which 4,000 native plants were planted to attract and support the native wildlife which live in the Zoo’s surroundings. It could be that my expectations of the message to be provided by a zoological facility are misguided, but at the Farm I miss the story about the consequences of the massive amounts of animal products we produce and consume worldwide — the impact on biodiversity and ecosystems. Unless I overlooked such vital information which is relevant for the message a zoo should get across, this part fails to impress me. This is not the case at the final stage of the Meet the Locals section where some lesser known locals are introduced including grand skinks, Otago skinks and Maud Island frogs. There it is explained how the Zoo is a conservation hub within New Zealand. Unfortunately, the kea aviary is still under construction, but the size is very promising. It will allow these smart mountain parrots, that use tools to get food and are capable of solving complex puzzles, to show normal behaviour — flying around. As this will be a walk-through aviary there will be an access point on the other side as well, that is near the Sumatran tiger enclosure.
At the moment the path ends here, so I return to the Meet the Locals entrance and turn towards the black-and-white ruffed lemurs opposite the current kea exhibit. They keep only two specimens of this Critically Endangered primate species. The social structure of the species varies from large groups to pairs in the wild, so keeping just two of them is not unnatural. The enclosure type is a bit old-school I would say, with wire mesh fences at the front except for the lower part where there are viewing windows. Nowadays, lemur enclosures are mostly presented as walk-through exhibits, but as I am not in favour of close encounters and touching I prefer the old-school type with much enrichment and vegetation like the one Wellington Zoo has built.
Meanwhile the footpath has reached a rather steep slope here. Most of the paths are gently sloping, but some are steep enough to make even a healthy adult walk slowly ?. As said, the Zoo is situated on one of the hills in the Wellington area, so a little effort was to be expected while exploring the grounds.
Before I go further uphill to the sun bear and Sumatran tiger territory I have a brief look at the golden lion tamarin exhibit. The tamarin are temporarily not on display, because just recently a new male has arrived from Bronx Zoo, USA, and was introduced to the Zoo’s female. The Zoo hopes they will contribute to the international conservation breeding programme, but to achieve this they first have to get used to each other backstage. The Mini Monkey house, where separate from the golden lion tamarin also pygmy marmosets are housed, comprises lots of vegetation in a naturalistic habitat. The pygmy marmosets share their habitats with Green Iguanas.
The two sun bears are currently the only bears held in a zoological facility in New Zealand. They have access to a large uphill situated enclosure with many boulders and a waterfall. To compensate for the lack of vegetation additional enrichment features are provided, such as tree trunks and wooden platforms, to mimic their original habitat in the tropical forests of Southeast Asia. One of the bears, born in the wild, was rescued from outside a store in Cambodia in 1996. He came to Wellington Zoo in 2004 as part of the regional Malayan Sun Bear breeding programme.
Next to the bear exhibit there are two tiger enclosures for the Sumatran tiger couple. These young tigers are potential partners within the breeding programme, but are kept separate and introduced slowly. The main and largest enclosure, although still much too small for an animal with such a large hunting territory as the tiger, is equipped with all features a big cat could wish for — a variety of vegetation that provide shade when needed, trees to satisfy its scratching behaviour, a pond for a cool dip, high level observation posts and several shelters. The other enclosure is smaller and hardly visible from any viewing position.
The highest point of the grounds has two dedicated areas, one for African species and one for Australian animals. Coming from the sun bears I start my tour around this part of the Zoo at the the mixed-species exhibit with giraffe, ostrich, helmeted guinea fowl and a large herd of nyala. It’s a large dry savannah type enclosure with an observation hut with a thatched roof and in one corner a fake African village to contribute to the make-believe Africa experience. In contrast to many of the bar-less enclosures I have seen so far, and much to my surprise, the serval and caracal that are kept across from the savannah area have not only wire mesh fences all around but a wire mesh netting as a roof as well. This is not per se a negative feature, as long as the needs of the species are met. But for species that like to climb trees and prefer high level observation or resting posts, or like to swing around in treetops, a wire mesh roof could impair their natural behaviour. Creating a roof in an exhibit normally means less height and no large trees available.
A little further along the path and neighbouring the caracal, another feline species that has the savannah as its native habitat can be found, the cheetah. This fastest land mammal has an open top enclosure at its disposal, that mimics a dry savannah. Partly due to the size of the enclosure, and partly because of the sloping grounds, a cheetah that will retire uphill will be invisible for visitors.
The enormous enclosure for the small troop of hamadryas baboons, seven to be exact, that follows on the left when I continue my tour, is most impressive. Too large to even consider creating a roof, the fences have a special rim that should keep the baboons from breaking out. It’s unlike the crowded baboon rock you’ll see in many European zoos. This enclosure with its sloping grounds is rather bare with some large boulders and the odd shrub, and it takes a few moments before I spot my first baboon.
I’m in for a surprise when I follow the path into the Australian outback section, called Neighbours. There’s a free roaming emu replacing the omnipresent peacocks in European zoos. I’m on my guard while proceeding. Not only because this is for the first time I experience a close encounter possibility with an emu, but also because I’ve heard about the damage an ostrich can cause when attacking a person. Common ostriches deliver slashing kicks with their powerful feet, armed with long claws, with which they can disembowel or kill a person with a single blow. And an emu is just a small ostrich or not. See for yourself:
Other species in the Australia section are the dingo, the inevitable Eastern grey kangaroo and the wallaby, as well as four Tasmanian devils that came to the Zoo in 2013, for the first time since the 1920s. Wellington Zoo supports the Save the Tasmanian Devil Program as of December 2013 to save the species from extinction due to the Devil Facial Tumour Disease — a rare contagious viral cancer that reduced wild Tasmanian Devil populations by about 80%. Within the programme the contributing zoos work together to create a healthy insurance population, that is crucial for repopulating Tasmania once the disease has been eliminated in the wild.
When leaving the Neighbours several African species are waiting ahead, of which the porcupine and meerkat are the least interesting. The chimpanzee troop of 10, however, is one of the largest in Australasia. They have a walled outdoor enclosure with lots of artificial enrichment, such as ropes, wooden poles and platforms, and a water-filled moat on the visitor’s side (see also video). And if it wasn’t for the wall the chimps would have a magnificent view on the city, but fortunately they can climb upon a platform to enjoy the views. It’s clear that the exhibit can do with some additional vegetation — a few trees and shrubs will take away the dullness of the grassy paddock. Perhaps the enclosure update that is expected to be completed mid to late 2018 will make the chimp habitat more naturalistic.
The last African species on my tour is the one with which it all began in 1906 when ‘King Dick’, a young African lion, was donated to the city by the Bostock and Wombwell Circus (see History). Nowadays the Zoo hosts five lions, but it is not actually a pride of five. The three females are kept separate from the two males to avoid any aggression, because the gender groups do not like each other that much. The somewhat circular outdoor enclosure has got a large rock formation in the middle that provides shadow, shelter and a high level observation platform. But further to this it is not very spectacular.
Wellington Zoo is not much different from other zoos worldwide regarding their animal collection. They made a brave decision in the 1980s to reduce the number of species and focus on endangered species instead of the common ones. But the choices of the species they keep are very similar to choices made at other zoos. Especially species that are attractive for the potential visitor, for instance renowned and dangerous such as tigers or lions, or with an extraordinarily anatomy like a giraffe, or supposedly cuddly like lemurs, and of course apes always increase visitor numbers. Thus, when I make my way to the exit it’s not a surprise to find a red panda exhibit on my right hand side. It’s a nice exhibit with a lot of vegetation including a few large trees that offer great sleeping places for the small carnivore with the thick red hairy coat from Asia whose diet consists mainly (98%) of bamboo.
Like many zoos with a long history and therefore many changes in the collection as well as in layout and buildings, they arrived at a in-between-solution of how to present the animal collection. Here at Wellington Zoo I saw three clearly defined areas with animals from a certain geographical origin, New Zealand, Africa and Australia. In addition they have grouped their primate species from three continents with nocturnal species as neighbours. The four non-primate species from Asian origin, Sumatran tiger, sun bear, red panda and small-clawed otter, are not really grouped I would say, they are more or less filling the gaps. All in all I think it is not too confusing for the ignorant visitor, also because the geographical origin is mentioned on the information panels. The species conservation status is provided according the classification of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™, next to a brief description of other species specifics. What is really disappointing is the lack of the scientific names of the species, on the information panels as well as on the website. Apart from this obvious flaw from educational point of view, the website is a good source of information on the Zoo’s species, including the conservation needs and the efforts the Zoo make to fulfil those needs.
Gibbon Island and Monkey Island are the most impressive exhibits in the zoo. Not spectacular as enclosures, but very quiet with primates well adapted to their environment. The otter enclosure allows you to have a close encounter with the very active little bugger. He’s fun, but take care. Unfortunately I was not able to spot the ever so important kiwi in the night-enclosure.
A small and quiet zoo, situated on one of the hills southwest of town.
Chimps are well-known for their ability to use tools for collecting food, for instance by poking a branch in a termite hill and collect those juicy delicious termites. This chimp at Wellington Zoo takes this to another level and shows how it can drink more dignified by using a tool.
These two Asian small-clawed otters have a different opinion about the sun, obviously. While one of them is hiding in the shadow, the other is wallowing in the warmth of the sun — or he could just be itchy.
Some additional information, such as contact details and involvement in breeding programmes.
The Zoo has limited car parking in the vicinity, therefore they encourage you to catch the bus.
Address:
200 Daniell Street
Newtown, Wellington
New Zealand
Bus no. 10 departs from Wellington Railway Station
Bus no. 23 departs from from Mairangi via Kelburn and Lambton Quay
Visit Metlink for bus departure times.
As Wellington is built in a hilly landscape and Newtown, where you will find the Zoo, is situated against one of the hills, you’re looking at a couple of hundred metres of strenuous pedalling when you come from downtown Wellington. But hey, this is New Zealand. Let us keep this city clean and use an environmental friendly mode of transportation. There are several bicycle shops that have rentals, as well as Base Backpackers on Kent Terrace.
From the city in less than 10 minutes — follow the brown ‘zoo’ signs. Limited free parking. Therefore it can be difficult to find a car park on busy days, and you are encouraged to park a little further away and walk up to the Zoo. Or catch the bus!
The first zoo in Auckland opened its gates to the public on 2 November 1911 in the Auckland suburb of Onehunga. The Royal Oak Zoo as it was called was established on about 2.5 hectare of land that entrepreneur John James Boyd purchased in February that year — land that was still totally bare at the time. It was the purpose of Boyd to establish Auckland’s first zoological facility. Such an effort he had accomplished earlier, in 1910, at Upper Aramoho near Wanganui, also on New Zealand’s North Island.
Boyd set up a private menagerie on the acquired grounds, which at its heydays added up to more than 2000 birds and other animals. The Royal Oak Zoo was a constant source of aggravation, because the local residents were upset and complained about the noise, the smell, the crowds, and the ever-present threat of having wild and dangerous animals on the loose in their neighbourhood. So Boyd’s Zoo became controversial, with the local Onehunga Borough Council trying to close it, but counteracted with a successful run for mayor of Onehunga by Boyd himself. Nevertheless, in the end the local Council forced Boyd to close the zoo in 1922. In June of 1922 the Auckland City Council purchased the remainder of the animals, the six lions, a tiger, a panther, one hyena, two dogs, vultures, an emu and several monkeys, that Boyd had not already sold to other individuals. And with that group of animals the early seeds of Auckland Zoo were sown. There is still a Boyd Street in Onehunga today.
Six months after the City Council bought the animals, on Saturday 16 December 1922, Auckland Zoo was opened to the public, at the current Western Springs location, then a semi rural area about 6km from town hall. The Zoo staff, at its opening, comprised one zookeeper, an assistant keeper, a turnstile attendant and a night watchman, all of them enjoying a seven-day working week. After only 6 months of construction work being done the new Zoo of just over 11 hectares was still an uninspiring place, but this didn’t last long. Soon, many trees were planted and in July 1923 the City Council decided on developing a bandstand, next to better enclosures for polar bear, hippopotamus, bison, elephant, tiger and other species. Many of these original zoo structures became and still are Zoo landmarks. Also in 1923 the Zoo’s first director, L.T. Griffin, went to Africa to source species from the wild. These trips to other continents were part of the aggressive Zoo policy of expansion over the next few years. But besides these trips, animals could be purchased due to donations, such as Jamuna the female Asian elephant, Auckland Zoo’s first star who arrived on June 1923 (see Auckland Zoo’s first elephants).
In these early years the Zoo expanded rapidly, new enclosures were built and new species arrived, also because businessmen donated animals which they had acquired on trips abroad. The Zoo’s developments were topped by the birth of 25 mammals and 62 birds at the zoo in 1928. Further to this, the Zoo’s mission was extended by the inauguration of the Auckland Zoological Society on 17 July 1929. Although its main purpose was to encourage scientific study, it became merely an interest and support group for the Zoo.
When in 1935 Lt. Col. E.R. Sawer was approached to report on where the zoo should be headed, the result impressed the City Council. They appointed Sawer as director/curator on 1 April 1936, after which he introduced the novel notion that zoological parks should focus on education, science and conservation.
In his report Sawer had called for animals to be paired or grouped, which is exactly what he did as well as introducing order and coordination. The changes that Sawer made reduced the enormously high mortality rates, that were normal in zoos at the time, from a whopping 35 percent in 1930 to about 10 percent in 1937. This even went as far as that in 1939 for the first time the number of births surpassed mortality in Zoo mammals. Especially, better animal diets including the provision of additional vitamins and other supplements led to noticeable improvements such as better fertility and reduced disease rates. Sawer’s good sense of marketing and the end of the economic depression helped the Zoo transform from a terrain with a group of emptying cages to a zoological park with a ‘full house of exhibits,’ including the accompanying exotic species — native fauna was not yet allowed.
Despite lower turnstile numbers and low priority for animal importation and food supply for the zoo animals during WWII, the war period was not quite as eventful as for zoos in countries in western Europe. Nonetheless, at the end of the war the Zoo was in a state of slight disrepair and depletion of stocks. The problem of building up a new animal collection was not easily solved after the war. Many zoos all over the world were looking to improve their collections, and New Zealand’s geographical isolation was more or less out of scope for the animal collectors and exporters. Moreover, Auckland Zoo was surpassed by Wellington Zoo on the list of politician’s favourites, and the Zoo was still not allowed to exhibit native fauna.
In 1948 the dark shadow of war disappeared with the approval of the construction of new facilities such as an aquarium, while in 1949 the Zoo was officially allowed to exhibit kiwi. But the postwar baby boom among New Zealand’s population led to a Council decision to create more entertainment activities in the Zoo, to satisfy the people with children. Sawer had always strongly resisted the introduction of animal entertainment as it had nothing to do with the Zoo being an educational institution, which it should be in his view. With Sawer retiring in 1949 he lost that battle, but he had another clear message for the Council — the Zoo needed a full-time on-site curator and veterinarian.
The next five years the Council’s commitment to further improve the Zoo showed when existing enclosures were renovated and new enclosures were built for sun bears, wombats, echidnas, monkeys, tigers and birds. At the same time progress was made by developing basic hospital facilities, a quarantine area, better equipment, and service areas. Visitor numbers increased, because Auckland citizens had more money and time to spend and other attractions were closed on Sundays and public holidays. This also led to the decision to introduce even more entertainment, especially animal entertainment. Following the popular chimpanzee tea parties at London Zoo, four chimps, who learned the ropes of performing a good tea party in London, arrived in October 1956 to perform for the Auckland community. After eight years of entertaining the crowds the chimps were relieved from their task when attitudes towards treatment of animals in captivity were beginning to change. During these rather prosperous 1950s other entertainment attractions were introduced such as a miniature train and the children’s zoo in 1958. A highlight in the animal collection could have been the birth of twin polar bears in June 1957. Unfortunately, one of the cubs died shortly after birth, while the other one drowned when 11 weeks old during the swimming lessons given by its mother. In the years between 1923 and 1995 Auckland Zoo exhibited several polar bears, and although some lived to an old age, they all developed skin lesions. Additionally, they had a bad track record regarding breeding polar bears, because only one cub was ever raised to adulthood at the Zoo.
The 1960s started with a new Zoo director (supervisor), Derek Wood, who was trained in the United Kingdom at Chester Zoo and he brought with him the first giraffe ever to set foot on New Zealand, John from London Zoo. As said the chimpanzee tea parties were terminated in 1964, in May to be exact, but the tea-party chimps remained at the zoo until their deaths. The tea-party chimps displayed abnormal, anti-social behaviour for the rest of their lives. Hence, none of them — except two chimps born in the Zoo that never participated in the tea-parties — could be introduced into the natural social group of chimpanzees that was established later in the 1980s. When in 2004 was decided to focus on just one great ape species — the orangutan, and the troop of six chimpanzees were relocated to Hamilton Zoo, Bobbie and Janie were the two surviving ‘tea party’ chimps that remained in Auckland. Bobbie died in November 2004 and Janie passed away in October 2013 at the age of 60, having lived at Auckland Zoo for 57 years.
Building activities continued in the 1960s and besides other considerable improvements a nocturnal house for New Zealand’s national icon, the kiwi, was erected. This period also saw the arrival of many new animals, including a female elephant from Singapore as the long-awaited companion for Jamuna the Asian elephant, to succeed the bull that was killed in 1936. But star elephant Jamuna died in September 1965, and replaced by Ma Schwe, a female Asian elephant, in 1968. Other new animals arrived, such as a female giraffe, a pair of Bengal tigers, two young polar bears, a giant anteater, two capuchin monkeys, white-tailed deer, 23 keas and four spider monkeys. The giraffe herd and spider monkey troop at the zoo today are descendants of these first imports.
Despite old enclosures being demolished and replaced by new ones the Zoo still suffered from the everlasting problems with flooding. As a matter of fact, even in June 1977 it was still possible that a hippo floated out of its enclosure into Western Springs during a flood. So, it should be no surprise that already in the 1960s the first serious calls for expansion arose and a major overhaul began. This led eventually to a long-term plan of the Council to modernise the Zoo with natural, moated, bar-less enclosures and an extension of the grounds into Western Springs park with approximately 5 hectares in 1973. For starters they closed the original entrance on Old Mill Road and opened a new entrance on Motions Road.
The 1970s saw enormous improvements, including those of the veterinary support, the stopping of public feeding, development of more naturalistic enclosures and introduction of behavioural enrichments. Subsequently the breeding successes increased. Animals deemed unsuitable for Auckland Zoo were transferred or phased out of the zoo’s collection, although it took another 20 years before the last polar bear died. During the late 1970s the Zoo was one enormous construction site with a new souvenir shop, cafeteria and enclosures for the giraffe, zebra and antelope to be completed. The overall professionalism increased with the employment of a full-time education officer as of 1975, and in 1976 the first comprehensive course for zookeepers started at the Auckland Technical Institute. Besides those developments new species arrived as well. People could come and watch white rhinoceroses and tamarins in the 1970s.
New enclosure development continued in the 1980s with a new hippopotamus exhibit and a new moated and bar-less orangutan exhibit opened, the latter is currently part of the Orangutan Trail. But probably the highlight of those days was the three-month stay of a pair of giant pandas. These pandas were part of an offer that the Chinese government made to the Australian Prime Minister for Australia’s bi-centennial celebrations. A three-month stay in Melbourne Zoo and a three-month stay in Taronga Zoo, Sydney, was organised, and Auckland Zoo quickly investigated the feasibility of a third stop in Auckland. Well, these became a popular three months in 1988, and all revenues were donated to giant panda research and conservation in China as well as to conservation projects in New Zealand. Not sure if this was the trigger that visitor numbers rose again after a decline in the early 80s when competition appeared due to the opening of the Rainbow’s End theme park and Kelly Tarlton’s Underwater World in the Auckland area, but the giant pandas alone were seen by about 300,000 visitors.
In 1989, Auckland as a city expanded when 11 territorial authorities merged into the large city of Auckland. A new Zoo Enterprise Board was established which became the legal entity responsible for the Zoo.
After WWII there had been a continuous flow of construction work ongoing at Auckland Zoo, either new construction or refurbishment. But this last decade of the twentieth century was a time of extreme change at Auckland Zoo, with almost half the zoo’s enclosures being renovated or replaced. As of 1990 the design focussed more and more on creating naturalistic habitats, which shows for instance in the Elephant Clearing. The construction of this exhibit began in 1990 and delivered a large moated outdoor enclosure with a modern elephant house and pool, in which the pachyderms could completely submerge. Another example of this type of exhibit design that is part of the 1991 Zoo development plan, is Pridelands. This large area, including the new savannah exhibit for giraffe, springbok, zebra and ostrich, flamingo, the rhino exhibit and Lion Hill, opened in 1997. For the lions it meant that they could leave the historic lion pit. Soon the area was extended with the Hippo River, a riverine forest area that encompassed a new hippopotamus exhibit and an enclosure for chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). A huge improvement for the baboons that had previously lived in a cage dating from 1926.
Despite the new exhibit and the Zoo’s good track record for breeding hippos a decision was made to phase out hippopotamuses (stop breeding). Due to the average life expectancy of the hippopotamus of 45 – 50 years, however, it would take a long time before all the hippos would die of old age they reckoned. The last two remaining hippos died in 2016, in March and August to be exact. Other species had to be phased out as well, it was decided. This included the wombat, puma, jaguar and leopard. While the genetic base for other species was strengthened, for instance by importing three southern white rhinoceroses from South Africa. One of the two female rhinos appeared 10 months pregnant on arrival from South Africa, so, in effect they had imported four specimens.
The chacma baboons were phased out starting around 2009 when the Zoo’s management decided to focus on the hamadryas baboon species, which is housed in zoos throughout the region.
Besides many smaller developments such as the new ring-tailed lemur enclosure and the new Wallaby walk-through, two other landmark exhibits were built in the 1990s, the New Zealand Aviary (1992) and The Rainforest (1996), a forested area that provides a natural environment for different primate species, including cotton-top tamarins. The New Zealand Aviary is a free-flight aviary and bush walk featuring NZ native species.
Another major development at the turn of the century was the Sea Lion and Penguin Shores, opened in 2001, which replaced the old Wallaby walk-through and small mammal enclosures. This exhibit was designed to recreate a New Zealand Coastal ecosystem featuring a beach and a large pool.
Then a period of relative calm started with regard to construction work, except for the building of the New Zealand Centre for Conservation Medicine (NZCCM) in 2007. But in 2010 with the opening of the Tropics exhibit, focussing on the hot and tropical Americas, things were fired up again. The New Zealand Aviary, originating from 1992, was redeveloped into ‘The Forest’ in 2011 and to be included in Te Wao Nui — the Zoo’s largest ever project development which is dedicated to New Zealand’s unique fauna and flora. Te Wao Nui (The Living Realm) opened on 11 September 2011 and covers about 4 hectare of the zoo grounds and comprises 6 habitats: The Coast, The Islands, The Wetlands, The Night, The Forest and The High Country. Another existing exhibit that was incorporated in Te Wao Nui is the Sea Lion and Penguin Shores renamed in the process as The Coast.
Then in May 2014, a new giraffe house was completed and in 2016 Auckland Zoo started their transformation into a 21st-century-zoo. In December 2016 ‘Strangely Beautiful Australia’ opened, which draws on the Murray-Darling region of Southeast Australia. The area is home to giant stick insects, Eastern snake-necked turtles, redback spiders, lace monitors and vibrant Australian birds who join the Tasmanian devils, red-necked wallabies and emu to create a bio-diverse Australian section. The development is the second part of the Zoo’s $120 million 10-year-development plan ‘Nearer to Nature’ 2016 – 2026.
Auckland Zoo became involved in many conservation projects over the years, but they made the headlines when they achieved a ‘world’s first’ in 1992 when ‘Hoki’, a kakapo — a native rare flightless parrot, was successfully artificially hatched and reared. It was returned in the wild to Maud Island, one of New Zealand’s offshore islands (see Kakapo recovery).
In addition to the Zoo’s existing conservation efforts the Auckland Zoo Conservation Fund was established in 2000 to support the conservation of endangered animals in the wild in both New Zealand and overseas.
Auckland Zoo veterinarians became renown for their knowledge, hands-on experience, and contribution to conservation projects including kakapo recovery. Hence, they were appointed supplier of veterinary services for the Department of Conservation’s Kakapo Recovery Programme in 2006.
In 2007 the New Zealand Centre for Conservation Medicine (NZCCM) opened — the first national centre for conservation medicine in the world — replacing the Zoo’s old veterinary centre.
The Zoo not only contributed to conservation of New Zealand’s indigenous species, because in 2008 three Sumatran tiger cubs were bred as part of the international captive breeding programme for this Critically Endangered tiger subspecies.
As part of the grand tour of kakapo Sirocco (see Kakapo recovery) Auckland Zoo hosted this ambassador for New Zealand conservation during Conservation Week 2009, in partnership with the Department of Conservation. Due to this event the Zoo became the first zoo ever to host a kakapo. Also in 2009 the Zoo released 12 Northern tuatara (descendants of the rare Cuvier Island population) onto Cuvier Island, boosting this island’s known tuatara population by over a third.
A milestone is achieved when 200 North Island brown kiwi chicks are successfully incubated, hatched, reared and released as part of the Operation Nest Egg (O.N.E.) programme (2010). O.N.E. is a Department of Conservation kiwi recovery programme where kiwi eggs are taken from the wild, hatched at the Zoo, and the chicks are kept on predator-free islands until they are grown, before releasing them into the wild.
Having successfully bred and raised several endangered species in the twentieth century, the start of the next century showed a continuation of such highlights that extended the Zoo’s breeding track record. In June 2000 the Zoo’s first white rhino calf was born, which was the first female white rhino born in New Zealand. The first ever successfully hatched greater flamingo chicks in Australasia, marked a world’s first for Auckland Zoo in January 2014. It was the first time a zoo had successfully bred from an entirely hand-reared flock in the world. Another world’s first was the successful breeding and (partly hand-)rearing in captivity of twin lesser short-tailed bats in 2014, a species endemic to New Zealand. Also in 2014 one female and three male Tasmanian devils move to Auckland Zoo from Australia’s Healesville Zoo to be part of an insurance population for this species and to raise awareness about the plight of this Endangered marsupial. Even more impressive was the first ever breeding and rearing success of the world’s most evolutionarily distinct and globally endangered (EDGE) amphibian, New Zealand’s rare and unique Archey’s frog, a ‘living fossil’. This boosted the Zoo’s Archey’s frog population to 25 in February 2016.
Unfortunately, not everything the Zoo accomplished received positive appraisal. When in 2015 and 2016 Auckland Zoo acquired two Asian elephants from Sri Lanka to enlarge the Zoo’s elephant number, it was reported by Born Free that both elephants were residents of a controversial Government-owned facility in Sri Lanka. Conditions at Pinnewala Elephant ‘Orphanage’ raised concern with the Born Free Foundation, as did the practice of exporting elephants from Sri Lanka to captive facilities such as zoos overseas. They firmly believe that such export to New Zealand will result in little or no conservation benefit to wild elephants.
(Source: Zoochat, Auckland Zoo website (accessed in January 2016), Wikipedia, Encyclopedia of the World’s Zoos)
Jamuna, thought to be six years old, came from the Zoological Gardens of Calcutta, accompanied by her mahout Ater Ali. Her purchase was funded by a donation from businessman, Auckland City Counsellor and first life member of the Auckland Zoological Society: John Court.
As the Elephant House was not yet completed when Jamuna arrived in June 1923, she was first housed in the council works depot. This proved to be less than ideal with Jamuna breaking out when left alone one evening and causing quite a bit of destruction. As Jamuna had been familiar with giving rides to children in Calcutta, she started giving rides to children at the Auckland Zoo on 10th November 1923 — for free. This was stipulated by John Court — rides on Jamuna would be free for the first year.
In 1930, following an offer from the Hobart City Council, a bull elephant, Rajah, was purchased as a companion for Jamuna. Rajah had spent his early days at Hobart Zoo (Beaumaris Zoo) where he was used for giving rides to children from 1927 until 1930 when economic factors forced Hobart City Council to sell Rajah. He had probably been taken from the wild in Burma and has been exhibited with a group of elephants at the 1924 British Empire Exhibition at Wembley, London, before being swapped for a Bennets Wallaby and a Tasmanian tiger arriving in 1925 and travelling to Beaumaris Zoo in Hobart.
Some said that Rajah quickly proved to be of a highly disagreeable disposition, was unable to be used for elephant rides, and after a string of incidents was finally shot by his keeper in 1936. But this seems to be highly unlikely, as he did a good job carrying children on his back in Hobart Zoo. In fact there is very little mention of Rajah and any issues in the zoo archives until the appointment of Col. Sawer who decided that Rajah should be destroyed. It had nothing to do with temper rather that Col. Sawer considered the elephant to be a liability. He asked permission to have Rajah destroyed and the bones and skin offered to the Auckland War Memorial Museum. it was granted with a note attached “No publicity”.
Jamuna’s mahout Ater Ali had a somewhat troubled relationship with his employers. There were disputes over pay and working conditions, which led to Ali leaving the Zoo in 1925. Unfortunately for Ali there were issues with his residency permits as well. As a result of these, being an overstayer, Ali was ordered to leave New Zealand.
Jamuna remained highly popular with children and other visitors. Tragically, in 1954, 65-year-old keeper Frank Lane died when the Jamuna swung her trunk, knocking him into a wall. The coroner judged the death to have been accidental rather than from a deliberate attack. Hence, Jamuna was not sentenced to death, but was allowed to continue giving rides to successive generations of children.
Jamuna passed away on 2 September 1965, and her 42 years of service was memorialised in a plaque placed on the wall of the elephant house. Jamuna’s influence is still seen today as the area outside the Old Elephant House function centre is now named Jamuna Plaza after her. The tradition of giving elephant rides died with Jamuna, because zoo practice had changed much over the years. As a replacement for Jamuna, in 1968 Ma Schwe was donated to the zoo by the son of John Court, the one who made it possible for the Zoo to acquire Jamuna. Ma Schwe died in 1982 of acute heart failure.
(Source: Wikipedia; Heritage et AL; Auckland War Memorial Museum)
After a refreshing morning rain I arrive at the Zoo entrance when the sky is clearing and the temperature reaches a nice 25°C.
I decide to go left after I entered the Zoo grounds and leave the giraffe, zebra and ostrich be in their impressively large Pridelands area, in particular because the passageway is closed due to ongoing construction work. Therefore I plan to approach this area from the other direction, probably just after lunch. On the left the first enclosure houses Asian small-clawed otter in a multilevel rocky environment with a creek that forms small ponds on various levels. The small waterfall, the bamboo shrubs and a few trees complete the imitation of the natural surroundings of the smallest of the otter subfamily (Lutrinae).
In the next-door exhibit, the red panda occupy not the obvious circular exhibit as you see in so many zoos nowadays, but a more elongated enclosure this time. A small stream partly surrounds an area with large shrubs and shelters where the three red pandas can sleep and hide, while a high wall prevents too much exposure of these Endangered red furry carnivores whose diet consists of 98% bamboo.
The information panels do not comprise a lot of graphics to explain species’ habitat, feeding behaviour or other peculiarities. Only a few contain geographical depiction of the species’ origin. The conservation status is not always mentioned, and when it is, the source is obviously the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™, but not stated as such.
Apart from the panels at the enclosures, several other types of info panels can be found when touring the premises. There are panels that besides overall conservation information give tips on what you can do yourself to reduce threats to nature.
Auckland Zoo has three Sumatran tigers that swap between enclosures so they can smell where the others have been marking, eating and sleeping. There are two enclosures; one of them is a deep pit with a really large and high rear wall. Both enclosures have jungle-like features with ponds and lots of vegetation. In one of them there’s a scratching pole — just as they sell them for domestic cats, only larger and more sturdy and solid I assume.
Instead of continuing towards the Aussie Walkabout I retrace my steps from the Tiger Territory to the otters and move on along Darwin’s eatery on the upward path to another combo of red panda and Asian small-clawed otters, who enjoy a healthy meal of fish-heads (see video).
Then I reach The Coast, which is one of the six habitats of Te Wao Nui (The Living Realm) that covers about 4 hectare of the zoo grounds. It’s a total concept that takes the visitor on a journey along New Zealand’s variety of fauna and flora. The artworks underpin the storyline and contribute to the experience. The journey starts at The Coast and winds through a number of enclosures including The Islands, The High Country, The Forest, The Night and The Wetlands, that all feature indigenous species.
The Coast was designed to recreate a New Zealand Coastal ecosystem featuring a beach and a large pool for California sea lion and native Fur Seal (kekeno in Maori language; Arctocephalus forsteri), featuring an enormous underwater viewing window, and an aviary for little blue penguins and other native shorebirds. The California sea lions on display were born at Auckland Zoo in the 1990s and will be taken care of for the rest of their lives. And although not found in New Zealand waters, they face many of the same threats as their New Zealand cousins and therefore are as good an ambassador for biodiversity and ecosystem health as a native marine mammal. See one such ambassador fly through the filtered salt water tank with a circulating supply:
The walk-through aviary for little blue penguins (Eudyptula minor), the world’s smallest penguins, comprises other shorebirds as well. That explains the wire mesh roof — to keep the spotted shag (Phalacrocorax punctatus) inside for instance. Austin, as the spotted shag of the Zoo is called, seems to be quite a character according the Zoo’s website, but I don’t spot him nor any other shorebird — if any.
I postpone my visit to the other New Zealand habitats of Te Wao Nui and turn right when I leave The Coast to go and have a look at the Africa section. This consists of the Hippo River and Pridelands. The name hippo river is easy to understand when I see an enclosure with two hippopotamuses in a pool from where a rivulet flows along other enclosures, providing an adequate environment for greater flamingos — supposedly the only flock in Australasia. But the name Pridelands doesn’t ring a bell, at least with me. It is a savannah like area that provides a home for cheetah, white rhinoceros, springbok, giraffe, zebra and ostrich. Pridelands is temporarily closed due to the reconstruction that is about to be completed at Easter. So, also the approach from this direction doesn’t deliver any views on the section where the giraffe, zebra and ostrich live together.
But first back to the entrance of the Africa section. That is the place where you can see the serval, while on the other side of the footpath two hippopotamuses enjoy their rather large pool that allows them to submerge and swim around. Despite quite good breeding results it has been decided to phase out the hippos. So for how long these pachyderms can be seen here in Auckland is uncertain (see also the video). The hippo pool can be considered either the beginning or the end of a rivulet which I cross several times progressing through ‘Africa’.
Before I reach the Asian elephant enclosure and the nearby Watering Hole where I have a quick lunch, I first pass the hamadryas baboon exhibit with a ‘baboon hill’ instead of the ‘baboon rock’ you’ll see in many other zoos. The grassy paddock and the small hill would suit many other ground-dwelling species, also primates such as geladas, also called bleeding heart monkeys. The latter you see less often in zoos, but both species are considered Least Concern according the IUCN Red List. This means that even when they switch to keeping geladas (as they have done years earlier from chacma baboons to hamadryas baboons) the primates are there just to represent the order of primates in the Africa section instead of providing a real contribution to ex-situ species conservation. Because then they should have chosen a more endangered species, in my opinion. The cheetahs inhabit a not so large enclosure with indeed a savannah-like look. The slightly undulating grounds provides plenty of shelters but not a good observation/resting post. Although there’s a pole with two high level platforms I doubt if a cheetah will be able to reach those platforms, because the pole has a smooth metal surface and the first platform is at least 5 metres above ground.
The two female Asian elephants, of which one is a resident since 1990, have their enclosures situated in the corner of the grounds tucked away as a surprise behind the Africa section. The outdoor exhibit is spacious and includes a nice pool with a large canvas as sunshade close to one of the viewing terraces. More distant from the public there’s a large paddock where I see both the elephants wander, enjoying the peace and quiet atmosphere over there. The elephant house is nothing more than a stable that provides neither sufficient space for the pachyderms nor any enrichment. Visitors are not allowed to enter the elephant house, but have viewing access via a large window. It’s no wonder that the latest Zoo development plan ‘Nearer to Nature, 2016 – 2026′ anticipates improvement of these indoor facilities.
From the local Watering Hole, as the café is called, where I revitalise myself I cross again the hippo rivulet and arrive at the enclosure that houses two female lionesses. It is a vegetation-rich exhibit with a hill that can be considered a high level observation post, while it creates a sheltered rear side where the lionesses can easily hide from the public. The water-filled moat on the visitor’s side makes this another good example of the Hagenbeck principle of enclosure design — bar-less and naturalistic. Two lionesses do not form a pride, and to be honest the size of the enclosure doesn’t give me the idea that more than two can be hosted, but for the animal’s sake a more robust social structure including a male would perhaps be better. On the other hand, the enrichment and excitement provided by the mixed-species exhibit with white rhino and especially springbok within sight of the lionesses makes it a bit more natural again. The white rhino and springbok are the last species of the Pridelands I can observe, because the footpath terminates at this point due to the construction work that will be ready in a few weeks time. A good moment for me to return to the native fauna and flora section, Te Wao Nui.
New Zealanders are or should be proud of their native species, that all have basically only a limited geographical distribution and therefore are easily prone to a reduction of their population size. Having such species on display and telling the visitors about the plight of some of them and the necessity of conservation cannot be applauded enough. They did a marvellous job in achieving this here at Auckland Zoo. The several walk-through exhibits, including a never seen before [by me] kea walk-through aviary, with information panels makes this place a wonderful educational facility. And it’s not just about the well-known and inevitable NZ species such as the kiwi, kea or tuatara. The Forest for instance is an absolute great enclosure situated on a densely forested hillside with birds such as the tui, New Zealand pigeon (kereru or kukupa in Maori language), North Island kaka and Reischek’s parakeet (Cyanoramphus hochstetteri) which is nesting underground in burrows. The nocturnal house called The Night with brown kiwi (Apteryx mantelli) on display is more or less part of The Wetlands where other habitat specific species can be found. The Zoo takes part in the Department of Conservation’s kiwi recovery programme called Operation Nest Egg (O.N.E). This programme involves taking kiwi eggs from the wild, hatching them at the Zoo, and then keeping them on predator-free islands until they are grown, before releasing them into the wild (more on kiwi conservation). Other bird species to be spotted in Te Wao Nui are the bellbird (korimako), blue duck (whio), takahe, and red-crowned parakeet (kakariki).
Having learnt quite a lot about New Zealand’s native fauna I continue to the Orangutan Trail that guides me along two grassy outdoor enclosures with artificial enrichment features such a wooden climbing frames, platforms, ropes and hard to reach feeding boxes. Three of the six Bornean orangutans are currently on tour to zoos in the United States of America (L.A. Zoo and Busch Gardens in Florida) as part of an international breeding programme schedule. Considering the very small indoor enclosure the three orangutans that are left will not complain I suppose. But redevelopment of the orangutan enclosures is scheduled as part of the ‘Nearer to Nature’ plan. During the second phase (2018−2020) of this 10-year plan they will develop Wild Asia, bringing together their species of the south-east Asian rainforests: small-clawed otter, siamang, tiger and Bornean orangutan. Those species are now somewhat scattered over the premises. I guess they will give the red panda a place as well in this new Asia section. Wild Asia will create more immersion exhibits — that is the current state-of-the-art for zoo enclosures — to provide the visitor with a better experience.
From the orangutan to the species of South America I pass along the ring-tailed lemurs that have a small patch of land at their disposal with plenty of vegetation and some additional enrichment. In the South America section they have macaws, Galapagos tortoises, cotton-top tamarins, pygmy marmosets and quite a few other tropical species on display, but the absolute highlight here is the elevated wooden boardwalk that guides you through a forested area. There I hear on my right Bolivian squirrel monkeys, but due to the dense vegetation I have trouble spotting them. On the left golden lion tamarin share their nice bushy, bar-less and open top outdoor exhibit with agouti. A bit further along the boardwalk I have an excellent view on the marvellous island for the black-handed spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) from one of the shelters near the boardwalk. The spider monkeys seem to enjoy their moated exhibit as they are exploring the many trees and shrubs to their heart’s content (see video). Compared to this, the siamang enclosure on the other side of the boardwalk is less impressive. It is surrounded on all sides, including the roof, by wire mesh netting and for this gibbon species that lives in the forest canopy in the wild the height of the enclosure will be disappointing.
The final section of my visit is the one for species of New Zealand’s big neighbour, Australia. The Aussie Walkabout is all walk-through, with emu and wallaby in a mixed-species exhibit and rainbow lorikeet in their own aviary. In New Zealand the rainbow lorikeet are considered a pest, because they compete with native NZ bird species for food and habitat. Quite understandable, the Tasmanian devils, with their reputation of being fierce and violent, are not to be visited in their enclosure. These Critically Endangered animals have several nice outdoor exhibits at their disposal though. I’ve seen quite a few of them as road kill in Tasmania, but luckily the one I see lying here is well-protected and fast asleep.
Auckland Zoo has gone to great lengths to present New Zealand’s native fauna and flora in the best way. They understand the real value of zoological facility and appreciation cannot be big enough for their approach. The New Zealand section fits in nicely with the grouping of the animal collection, which is basically geographically. Of course at a place like Auckland Zoo dating back from the early twentieth century you’ll still find the odd one out: the Asian elephants behind the Africa section; the siamang near the South American primate species; and the ring-tailed lemur, meerkat and porcupine separated from the huge Africa section by several Asia enclosures. But as construction work and improvement are both inextricably linked with Auckland Zoo, these minor flaws in the grouping of their collection will be solved. If not with the current development plan, than with the next one.
All otters love fish, and so do the Asian small-clawed otters at Auckland Zoo, even if it’s only the head — as long as it is a big and fishy of course!
The black-handed spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) have access to a wonderful island which they can explore to their heart’s content. The island has its limits of course. It’s never big enough considering the original forested habitat of the monkeys, but the trees and other vegetation allow the monkeys to express natural behaviour, as you can see.
See how the baboons go straight for the food that was ‘hidden’ from them by the zookeepers. It’s obvious they know all the places the keepers use to conceal the food. Nevertheless, they have to work for it as in the wild — only not as hard.
How do you get hippos out of the water? Promise them food, and they do what most animals do — they listen — one comes and the other follows suit.
The hippos were being phased out of the Zoo’s animal collection and later that year — the video being recorded in March 2016 — both hippos died.
New Zealand’s forest used to be home to millions of kiwi. Now there are only 68,000 left.
Natalie Clark, kiwi keeper at Auckland Zoo, and Ray Walters, former ranger at Tiritiri Matangi island, have been fighting to save their national bird from extinction in the wild.
Is it fair to kill invasive species which humans have introduced? When people move around the world, many of their favourite — and not so favourite — animals tag along for the ride. From cane toads through to rats, cats and crayfish, so-called ‘invasive species’ can destroy ecosystems and kill off native wildlife. CrowdScience listener Jude Kirkham wants to know if eradicating these invaders is justified.
One country determined to do something about invasive species is New Zealand, where rats, stoats and possums are causing irreparable damage to the country’s unique bird life. If nothing is done, the iconic Kiwi could be extinct within 50 years. The government and volunteer groups across the country have responded with a plan to eradicate predatory mammals from New Zealand by 2050. But is all the time, energy and money needed to do this really justified? And is it morally right to kill off an animal species that humans introduced in the first place?
Presenter: Marnie Chesterton
Producer: Anna Lacey
(Source: BBC World Service Crowd Science)
The kakapo (Strigops habroptila) is a large flightless parrot native to New Zealand. This ground-dwelling bird lived on the isolated islands of New Zealand for thousands of years and evolved into a very remarkable bird. Human colonisation, however, together with the predators which the settlers introduced drove the kakapo towards extinction. The kakapo were hunted for its plumage and meat by Polynesian settlers, while European settlers cleared the land and destroyed its habitat too. The parrot had never seen a stoat, rat, cat or dog, and more importantly it had no ability to fly away when they were hunted as prey by those invasive predator species. By 1995, only 51 known kakapo survived on just a handful of small island sanctuaries.
Today, thanks to a kakapo recovery plan, the world (= NZ) population of kakapo comprises 154 individuals (census of 2017). With a comprehensive Kakapo Recovery Programme underway, the kakapo seems on its first tentative steps to recovery. Still, it is classified as Critically Endangered according the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™.
The kakapo is not just a large and flightless parrot, it is the world’s heaviest as well, which makes tree climbing a tricky thing for the kakapo:
Every known living kakapo, except some young chicks, has been given a name by Kakapo Recovery Programme officials. Many of the older birds were given English names, but more recent chicks have been given Māori names.
A good overview of what is important for kakapo recovery is depicted in this infographic, of which a better view is available at the kakapo recovery pages of the Department of Conservation website:
A recent (2022) announcement of the team that runs the Kakapo Recovery conservation programme provides hope for the long-term survival of the kakapo! A blog on EDGE of Extinction (a website about Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally Endangered species) not only gives a good description of the Kakapo and its peculiarities, but also says that the kakapo’s population soared to its highest number in almost 50 years, reaching 216 birds after 55 chicks survived to become juveniles this year.
Kakapo Hoki is an extraordinary specimen considering the role of Auckland Zoo in raising her. She hatched on Codfish Island (Whenua Hou) in 1992. When, at the age of five weeks, natural food supplies failed and Hoki would have starved to death, she was taken from a nest and hand-raised at Auckland Zoo, a ‘world’s first’. Hoki became the first kakapo to be partially raised in captivity and provided conservationists with a special opportunity to get to know the habits and behaviour of the species.
After about five years Hoki was returned in the wild to Maud Island in the Marlborough Sounds of New Zealand’s North Island, which was an unlikely haven for the kakapo. This small 320ha island is a patchwork of pasture, native forest and exotic pines. By watching her grow up on Maud Island, staff soon learnt just how intelligent and entertaining kakapo can be. She used to create her own amusements, such as springing up and down on branches, and would often play with the zippers and buttons of human clothing. Not unlike what kea, another parrot-like species of New Zealand, do in the wild — though less playful and more destructive. She also gave a good introduction to kakapo biology and development, as staff watched her during her years in captivity, learning to call and display as she would do in the wild.
Hoki now lives on Codfish Island where she has a reputation as being a bit bad-tempered with humans — perhaps because she got used to having things her own way for so long while in captivity.
Hoki has bred two times now, in 2002 and 2009. Unfortunately in 2002 the embryo died during incubation, while the second egg in 2009 proved infertile. However, both times she was given a fostered egg to care for and became a successful foster parent.
Another extraordinary kakapo is Sirocco. He is the ambassador for the Kakapo Recovery Programme, in other words he is New Zealand’s ambassador for conservation of native species. Through a relentless touring schedule, Sirocco reaches thousands of people raising awareness of the conservation issues that face New Zealanders today.
Sirocco suffered a respiratory illness at three weeks old while being raised by his mother. When it was discovered by rangers during a routine visit to the nest, it was decided he needed treatment. Thus Sirocco became the first male kakapo to be hand-raised. After he was fit enough again and released in the wild he didn’t want to roam the island. He wanted to stay with humans, being imprinted on this two-legged mammal species. As a result, the Kakapo Recovery team realised he was unlikely to be an effective breeding bird, but instead an extremely good advocate for his species, providing the best opportunity for people to meet a live kakapo.
So, they started touring with him to allow people to have close encounters with him. Nonetheless, Sirocco remains a wild bird and does not live in captivity permanently. But he seemed to thrive on all the attention when touring and doesn’t mind being on display to the public — a genuine ambassador.
As said Sirocco remains a wild bird and when Sirocco’s transmitter failed in 2016 he couldn’t be found any more. He was last seen on 1 March 2016 and initial search efforts failed to locate him. He was living with other male kakapo on a predator-free, densely forested island in Fiordland. Hence, it was very difficult to find him without the signals from his transmitter, but the habitat provided plenty of food and there was no danger of predators. Therefore they were not concerned for his safety. They continued to look for Sirocco and a dedicated search at the beginning of 2018 re-located him. A subsequent assessment showed he was still his regular, sociable self. So, it was decided he could pick up where he left — being the ambassador for the Kakapo Recovery Programme. The now 21 year old Sirocco will make his first public appearance since 2014 and will be visiting Orokonui Ecosanctuary in Dunedin from 9 — 29 September 2018, Sirocco’s third time here. However, like any superstar, the public appearance will be entirely on his terms. Sirocco’s welfare is paramount so there are strict conditions in place to ensure he’s safe, happy and comfortable.
In the BBC series New Zealand: Earth’s Mythical Islands, kakapo Ranger Errol Nye gives a true insight into life with a fine feathered celebrity. A unique bond and special friendship has developed from an incredible conservation movement.
Auckland Zoo has been and remains a great supporter of Kakapo Recovery. The New Zealand Centre for Conservation Medicine (NZCCM), which is also Auckland Zoo Vet Hospital, is important to the research efforts within the Kakapo Recovery Programme regarding a number of health issues such as cloacitis (‘crusty bum’) and knowledge about natural vitamin D levels in kakapo. The NZCCM team also provides hospital care and treatment for sick or injured kakapo as and when needed.
In addition to on site service, members of the NZCCM team do field work as well. For instance together with rangers from the Department of Conservation they carry out regular health checks in the field, especially checking for cloacitis:
And last but not least the Zoo supports kakapo recovery through the Auckland Zoo Conservation Fund.
(Source: Kakapo Recovery; Encyclopedia of the World’s Zoos; BBC YouTube channel; Department of Conservation media release, 13.08.2018)
Auckland Zoo is located just west of downtown Auckland and next to the beautiful Western Springs Reserve and close to the Museum of Transport and Technology (MOTAT). MOTAT’s tram network provides a link between both attractions.
Address:
Motions Road
Western Springs
Auckland 1022
New Zealand
For bus and other public transport options to get to Auckland Zoo visit the Auckland Transport journey planner. If taking the bus, the closest stop is 8124 on Great North Road, opposite Motions Road (with a short walk down Motions Road to Auckland Zoo entrance).
As Auckland is not particularly hilly and the surroundings of the Zoo, west of the central business district, can be regarded as rather flat, you’re looking at an easy bicycle ride of less than 5 km coming from the city centre. And you should have no problem finding a rental bike. Finding a decent bicycle rack near the entrance of the premises is another thing though.
Auckland Zoo is well signposted both east and westbound on the North Western motorway, use satnav or the journey planner (below) to get directions to Auckland Zoo.
Auckland Zoo has two large car parks providing free off-street parking for cars, charter buses and tour coaches.
Download the zoo map here.
In 1952 the Indian Board for Wildlife felt the national capital needed a zoological park to provide recreation for society at large. Therefore an ad-hoc committee was established of several high-ranking nature lovers of Delhi, including Smt. Indira Gandhi, to draft a proposal. In September 1953 a decision was made on the new zoo’s location, the site between Purana Quila and Humayun’s Tomb, which is the current location still. Furthermore, it was decided that the Central Government would develop the site into a zoological park after which it would be handed it over as a working enterprise to the Forest Department of the Delhi Government.
The Indian Board for Wildlife felt that a good zoo should be founded on modern principles with open, moated enclosures and naturalistic displays to serve as an example to other zoos.
The first plan for the development of such a zoo was drafted by Major Weinmann, Director of the Ceylon Zoological Garden — now the National Zoological Gardens of Sri Lanka. As Weinmann was not available for the long term, Carl-Heinrich Hagenbeck, owner of Hagenbeck Zoo at Hamburg, Germany, was asked to take things forward. He was the grandson of the world-famous founder of Hagenbeck Zoo, who was the first to introduce the idea of open moated bar-less enclosures. So the grandson was definitely suited for the job to meet the requirements of the Indian Board for Wildlife.
The preliminary plan was ready by March 1956 and provided a general layout of waterways, roads and paths, animal enclosures and sewage system. After some adjustment to meet the local conditions and topography of the ground the Government of India approved the plan on 31st December 1956. Honouring his grandfather Carl Hagenbeck, grandson Carl-Heinrich Hagenbeck designed from scratch a zoo like Hagenbeck Zoo in Hamburg with large open moated enclosures, only four times larger (100 ha), and the largest of India. For instance, the tiger enclosure was an exact copy of the tiger enclosure in Hamburg zoo, just bigger.
By the end of 1959, construction had sufficiently advanced. The Northern part of the zoo was ready to welcome animals as well as visitors.The grounds consisted of roads, waterways, moats, ponds, lawns, plantation and most importantly animal enclosuresand animal houses. Animals that had been arriving as gifts from State Government and individuals since the announcement of the establishment of a zoological park at Delhi, could finally be moved from the temporary pens to their permanent enclosures. The collection comprisedtigers, leopards, bears, foxes, monkeys, deer, antelope and many bird species.
The park was opened on 1 November 1959 as the Delhi Zoological Park. In 1982 it was officially renamed to National Zoological Park which reflected more correctly the purpose of this institution — a Zoo managed and financed by the central government to provide a model for other zoos in the country.
The first years after the inauguration Delhi Zoo fulfilled its duty as a ‘model’ zoo for the entire country. It was well known for its inspiring Hagenbeck style design and animal collection which was grouped according the then-popular concept of continental areas. In addition the Zoological Park was well known for its breeding successes of white tiger, lion-tailed macaque, and Manipur brow-antlered deer or sangai.
Unfortunately, due to bureaucratic delays and obstructive procedures the National Zoological Park deteriorated rapidly. Over the years, the government agencies that had to manage the Zoo had to deal with many more public issues. Most of these issues were of greater public importance than taking care of the Zoo. Especially, running the Zoo as a public enterprise complicates things. For instance the Delhi Public Works Department is the only agency that is permitted to do maintenance, and the zoo is a very low priority for the Department.
A possible solution to stop further deterioration could be privatisation. The Central Zoo Authority (CZA) has already made an attempt to achieve this for the National Zoological Park. If such a privatisation can be successful and will lead to a transformation that will make the National Zoo to be manageable and prosper again, other municipal and state-run zoos might follow the example. In 2001 a master plan was developed to make the National Zoo a world class zoo that is up to standard. The plan was prepared under the guidance of the CZA and will provide more space and a natural habitat for the animals. The plan’s full implementation was envisaged for around 2006.
Unfortunately the endeavours to become a world class zoo didn’t prove very successful, as the Zoo made the headlines, because of a series of zoo animal deaths in 2015 and 2016, such as hog deer, lion-tailed macaque, langur, giraffe and cape buffalo. Moreover, the zoo officials have been accused of under-reporting the number of deaths among the animal collection and presenting falsified postmortem reports to the CZA. This raised questions regarding the maintenance, management and attitude of the zoo officials.
But whatever may happen in the (near) future, the National Zoo has played a major role in modern Indian zoo history. At the National Zoological Park, birds and animals still live in an environment that in many ways resemble their natural habitat. The National Zoological Park not only provides a home for endangered species, but also helps them to breed in captivity.
Not unlike many other zoos in the world Delhi Zoo has suffered the occasional outbreak of an infectious disease. An outbreak of avian influenza in autumn 2016 even led to a complete shutdown from mid October 2016 until January 2017. This drastic measure was taken by the Delhi government to tackle the problem effectively, but partly due to the barrage of criticism over how it handled the dengue and chikungunya fever outbreaks among the City population during the monsoons.
Since its onset the Zoo is located on Mathura road next to the famous old fort Purana Qila. Remains of one of the walls of this old fort, built in the 16th century, are visible while walking along the northern edge of the Zoo grounds. Not far from the entrance you can also find a 17th century milestone, a Kos Minar built by Jehangir.
(Sources: Zoo and Aquarium History by Vernon N. Kisling, jr.; Zoo: A History of Zoological Gardens in the West by Eric Baratay and Elisabeth Hardouin-Fugier; website National Zoological Park Delhi; Wikipedia; The Times of India)
It has been over eight years since my first visit to Delhi Zoo or the National Zoological Park as it is officially called. This time the weather is a bit more friendly — less hot and damp — to my non-acclimatised fitness and there’s even less smog in town. In other words perfect conditions for a short visit and see if things have changed, and if the master plan has further materialised.
First thing I notice when I arrive at the gate — after I convinced the tuktuk driver that I just needed to be brought to the Zoo that was most certainly not closed today — is the renovated if not revamped entrance. And with the entrance the procedures are changed as well. Although I cannot remember all from eight years ago, this time the foreigner ticket has to be purchased at the booth left from the entrance gate. Next my rucksack and I undergo a physical check in the ‘gents’ lane, but not before I pay an additional fee for bringing a camera.
Before I reach the first enclosure I notice that they have made the warning message about the legal prohibition of teasing and feeding zoo animals stand out even more than last time (see Signage, Information and Education). So, after being searched and warned for what is not allowed into the park I decide to obey by the rules, because a few months in an Indian prison is not what I see as an appropriate extension of my stay in India.
The first enclosure I encounter is a mixed-species exhibit comprising spotted deer, barking deer or muntjac, sambar deer, nilgai and blackbuck. Unfortunately this is only one of a few mixed-species exhibits to be found on the Zoo grounds, so they haven’t lived up to their master plan yet. This enclosure with ‘Herbivores of Central India’ is of considerable size and provides shade and vegetation. It is a good example of what is about to come, many indigenous species — especially deer herds — in large dry moated paddocks. The grouping of the animal collection is a bit unclear, but it seems to be based on taxonomic arguments, such as primates, deer, carnivores, birds and reptiles, with the deer species outnumbering all the other species.
It is obvious that the biggest problem of the Zoo is water-related, scarcity of clean water and lack of proper drainage. Nevertheless an overhead water-tank should be operational by now as the zoo scheduled to have its own reservoir under the master plan.
The large water bird pond is still as impressive as it was eight years ago and doesn’t show to suffer from water shortage. Its green water is not a sign of bad quality but due to algae and duckweed growth, which both are beneficial for the water birds. The birds that populate the large pond are not pinioned and choose to be there on their own free will, but basically because of the food that is provided of course. Some of the bird species are migratory birds.
Turning left and with the remains of the old fort Purana Qila on my left, I enter the primate section. The lion-tailed macaque island is surrounded by a water-filled moat and comprises several enrichment features. The same can be said of the chimpanzee enclosure that is beautifully situated uphill and apparently contains some remains of a former wall, but this could be fake. Across from the chimpanzees a large moated grassy exhibit with a few large trees houses a few fat rhesus macaques and grey langurs, while another primate enclosure is under development in the farthest left corner of the Zoo grounds. Although I didn’t see any chimpanzees, I am afraid that — like in 2008 — there isn’t a large group of chimps in the Zoo’s collection, because only a low number of lion-tailed macaques and rhesus macaques are kept as well. This is an old-fashioned lack of behavioural enrichment and not good to fulfil the social needs of the great apes and the macaques, which all live in large socially hierarchic troops.
From this point onwards several large enclosures follow for different deer species, none of them held together in a mixed-species exhibit. Nevertheless, these are large modern facilities with large herds of deer species that provide space as well as shade, either through vegetation or artificial constructions. The sambar deer and blackbuck that inhabit the mixed-species exhibit near the entrance both have an impressively large enclosure at their disposal in this section as well. Especially the blackbuck enclosure is beautiful.
It’s obvious that improvements have been achieved in this part of the zoo, because various old abandoned relics from the past are there to be seen, situated close to the modern deer enclosures. At least they seem abandoned and not in use any more, which I hope they really are.
While enjoying the spacious layout of the park I hear in the distance the typical call of a gibbon species. I am looking forward to see if improvements have been made to the design and the enrichment features of their enclosure since my previous visit. Something that is really necessary when I see the small predator exhibits that I am about to approach. Two blocks of modern cages appear when I follow the main footpath along the blackbuck domain. Cages that contain and display a jungle cat (Felis chaus), common palm civet (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus), small Indian civet (Viverricula indica), Bengal fox (Vulpes bengalensis) and jackal (Canis aureus). All of which classified as Least Concern according the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, so they have no actual conservation value and are there just to be shown to the public. All the more reason to provide them with an enclosure that meet modern standards that allow natural behaviour, which is absolutely not the case in these ridiculously small enclosures here at Delhi Zoo, even though the cats have access to high level platforms.
Almost all exhibits here at the National Zoological Park, apart from the aviaries and some awful examples as the ones for the small predators, are moated enclosures according the original Hagenbeck style. Most of the moats are dry and accessible to the animals, and therefore not an additional burden to the limited water supply. The Indian rhino enclosure is a good example of such design, although the rhinos are denied access to the moat by a fence that looks rather fragile considering the mass of these pachyderms. But there is no reason for the rhinos to go walkabout in the moat, because they have access to a huge area with trees that provide shade and ponds to cooling off.
The next door bird section is much less impressive. The row of old-fashioned aviaries situated in a semi-circle around a shady area that is inviting for having a picnic — which is impossible as you are not allowed to bring ‘eatables’ on the premises — comprises a large collection of various bird species. Unfortunately, each aviary is small in size with just a few specimens on display, which seems to be the golden rule here at Delhi Zoo except for the deer species that are kept in large herds.
The single male African elephant that is housed in the south-east corner of the grounds has ample space to roam around in an area that is not perfectly landscaped. In fact this ‘neglected’ area looks like a wild savannah, nice! I can imagine that the elephant misses social contact of conspecifics and that he therefore tries to make contact with passing visitors. But unfortunately for him the footpath closest to the enclosure is blocked.
The hippopotamus, another pachyderm species not indigenous to Asia, is represented by six specimens. These hippos occupy two similarly designed enclosures, both with a large pool. The fourth pachyderm species of Delhi Zoo is kept in yet another differently styled exhibit. The viewing opportunities at the Asian elephants exhibit are better than at the African elephant exhibit, but that also means that the visitor has a good opportunity to assess what it’s lacking — enrichment features such as a pool. I see only one elephant, although there are supposed to be two of them — still not a herd of course. From the Asian elephant exhibit I walk back to the two hoolock gibbons (Hoolock hoolock), who have stopped ‘singing’ about an hour ago, and check out their enclosure. Unfortunately, although of a modern design with a deep dry moat, it is small and lacks sufficient enrichment. It is a pity to see there are no proper facilities to allow the gibbons to express their natural swinging behaviour through a forest canopy, or something artificial that resembles treetops more than the current design.
Several species can be found in more than one enclosure, such as the aforementioned sambar deer and blackbuck. Likewise, the Asian lions are distributed over two moated enclosures, of which the one close to the giraffe paddock is the best in my opinion. That one has a dry moat, several elevations, good shelters and observation platforms, while the other one has a water-filled moat and flat grounds. The giraffe enclosure that is situated back to back to one of the lion enclosures shows no sign of life. It is a beautiful dry paddock with large trees resembling a savannah area, but apparently it is empty — at least the information panel is empty as well. It is not the only enclosure that is actually empty while no notification or explanation is given. In this case it is probably due to questionable management because the Zoo’s giraffes died as part of a series of deaths in 2015 and 2016 of several different animals including hog deer, lion-tailed macaque, langur and cape buffalo. The last giraffe died in 2016.
More or less across from the giraffe enclosure there are two similar bear enclosure located next to each other. The enclosures for sloth bear and Asian black bear both have a typical amphitheatre design with a deep dry moat on the visitors’ side.
The Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) are distributed over three different enclosures. The Zoo is more or less famous for its white Bengal tigers, which is very unfortunate, because there is no such thing as a wild white tiger, in fact they are a genetic aberration and suffer from many genetic problems due to inbreeding in zoos (see also Having white tigers on display in zoos — an appalling logic?). All enclosures have a modern design and will stand comparison with most tiger enclosures of renowned zoos, although too small in size, of course, like everywhere.
Delhi Zoo management made a wise decision to have only a limited number of species on display. Whether or not it is financially driven, it allows for large enclosures to be developed and the possibility to create large social groups of species that do so themselves in the wild. But apart from the ungulates there are only a few specimens of most other species in the Zoo’s animal collection. This is a shame for especially the primates that live in social troops, such as the chimpanzee. Remember, there’s only one chimp according the Zoo’s own inventory on the website.
What’s striking is the total lack of specific children entertainment, neither playgrounds nor education.
Considering food and drinks I thought it would be safer to bring my own water, although there are several ‘water points’ scattered around the premises where drinking water is available. You are not allowed to bring your own food, but there are a few small and simple food stalls inside that sell ice cream and candy. Near the car park and the square in front of the entrance there’s a large food court for those already accustomed to street vendor’s food in India or those with a sturdy digestion.
The zoo is more or less famous for its two white tigers. I am not sure if they have good breeding results with these aberrant Bengal tigers, because that is what they are those white tigers. There are no wild white tiger populations, and those kept in captivity are highly inbred. (see also the White Tiger fraud on the Big Cat Rescue website). When the Zoo’s breeding results are poor it is not because the tigers won’t mate. For the first time ever I saw two tigers mate, right there in the zoo enclosure before my eyes. I couldn’t believe it at first, so I nearly forgot to take a picture. A white male copulating with a normal coloured female Bengal tiger in public, this made my visit to Delhi Zoo a success, no matter what. The focus seems to be on ruminants, especially deer. In general, there are large enclosures for these animales. The grounds are enormous compared to the number of animals in the zoo. Some enclosures are abandoned (budget constraints?). Chimpanzee hill seems very empty with just two chimps to inhabit it (1 male, 1 female). Other primate enclosures (Gibbon, Macaque), although rather modern in lay-out, do not provide a lot of enrichment.
They have an interesting policy regarding birds. Some birds are provided areas to nest but are free to go (storks and waterbirds), other birds are housed in old-fashioned aviaries. Like caged birds of prey with hardly any space to move (fly) around. The kites you see everywhere in Delhi you will see also in the zoo, occupying the trees. They have access to all the open enclosures. The wolf enclosure is a shame (although wolves were not seen). The one female lion seemed lonely in her huge enclosure. The other feline species (except the tigers) are housed in old fashioned cages, some with and some without high observation posts.
Apparently this white tiger knows something its two fellow inmates are not aware of, because they are still lying relaxed on the ground. While the one in the footage is actively waiting for something and expect it to arrive soon. Must be food, as that is what all cats big and small do, don’t they — sleep, rest or eat.
To guide people around the large Zoo grounds there are two types of signposts in use (old and new) together with large maps on strategical locations. This is rather helpful, because besides the main route there are many crossroads and side paths.
It appears that it should be made very clear to the visitors that it is legally forbidden to tease and feed animals in the zoo and that any violation of that law is punishable with imprisonment for a term up to six months. And people are rather often reminded about this prohibition with panels along the footpath, panels that are sometimes very graphical.
The information panels at the enclosures provide quite some detailed knowledge about the species kept there, but it is all text and no graphics whatsoever. Personally I don’t mind, but it is not without reason that you see graphical interpretation of the species’ habitat and geographical distribution, and sometimes even on their nourishment, in many zoos today. This quickly updates the visitor on these basic topics and allow more time for further reading on other interesting facts about the species. The same can be said for the species’ conservation status. Most self-respecting zoological gardens use the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species classification to show the current conservation status of the species on display. And preferably by using the graphics of the Red List itself. This is not the case here at Delhi Zoo, however, information about the conservation status is sometimes given, although it sometimes requires interpretation of the text.
Despite these small flaws plenty of information is provided that can make the visitor leave the zoo more knowledgeable about the animals they have seen than before they entered. If they take the time to read it of course. But especially the ‘fun’ facts, such as ‘the rhesus macaque was the first primate to be sent in space with a space ship’, will do the trick I hope.
Apart from the species’ information panels near the enclosures there are hardly any other instruments they use to have a tour around the zoo grounds be of more educational value for either the general public or for children specifically. Nevertheless the Zoo is trying to raise awareness on the value of nature conservation among the general public and therefore organises various special programmes about nature and the Zoo’s endeavours in this field in the Education Centre near the chimpanzee enclosure.
Furthermore the National Zoological Park as Delhi Zoo officially is called has a library for nature lovers, researchers and students. They have around 2100 books, magazine and journal subscriptions available mostly related to the field of wildlife management, veterinary science and horticulture.
In addition to their educational efforts Delhi Zoo participates ‘hands-on’ in the conservation breeding programmes of endangered Indian species — an initiative of the Central Zoo Authority.
Address:
Mathura Road
PIN — 110003
New Delhi
India
The best choice to go to the Zoo is public transport I guess. If you arrive in New Delhi at either one of the railway or bus stations you are still at least 5 km away from the Zoo. If you don’t mind walking you are okay then, but otherwise you should decide which mode of transportation to take next. The nearest metro stations to the Zoo are Pragati Maidan Metro Station and CGO Complex, Lodi Road, both approximately 2 km from the Zoo still.
There are several buses that pass the Zoo. Delhi Transport Corporation Bus routes towards the Zoo are as follows:
No. | From | To | |
894-A | New Delhi Rly. Station | Holy Family Okhla | |
445 | New Delhi Rly. Station | Greater Kailash | |
374 | Nand Nagari | Nehru Place | |
402 | Old Delhi Rly. Station | Okhla | |
403 | Old Delhi Rly. Station | Okhla Village | |
405 | ISBT | Badarpur Border | |
419 | Old Delhi Rly. Station | Ambedkar Nagar | |
423 | Mori Gate | Ambedkar Nagar | |
425 | ISBT | Kalkaji | |
429 | ISBT | Ambedkar Nagar | |
438 | Old Delhi Rly. Station | Jaitpur | |
966 | Nangloi | Nizamudin Rly. Station |
For more information on prices and time tables you check the DTC website.
If you want to go the easy way you can order a taxi at your hotel or you could take a motorised rickshaw, but you should be prepared to (a) negotiate the price and (b) give additional geographical locations where you want to go, because sometimes they don’t know where the zoo is (or pretend not to know), in which case you end up travelling a longer distance than is really necessary, including a higher price.
Cycling, is far from being a lifestyle choice for people living in New Delhi. Cyclists are at the bottom of the city’s road system, and cycles continue to be a mode of transport for the poor. According to a recent Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) report, Delhi tops in road accidents deaths in the country and is most unsafe for cyclists. On an average two cyclists die every week on Delhi roads, and for traffic police, cyclists and pedestrians just do not exist (Source: Hindustan Times, 18.10.2014).
So, going to the Zoo on your own on a bicycle is not recommended. Besides it will be difficult to find a bicycle rental shop. Although there’s a company that organise guided tours on bicycle through the city of Delhi — a company started by a Dutchman of course!.
I wouldn’t recommend to go by car to the Zoo either. Firstly, they drive like they all want to be first at the same spot which lead to many near-collisions. But secondly, as a result of this kind of driving, the traffic congestion is enormous, and rush hour means there’s a total standstill on the roads. Except for bicycles and sometimes rickshaws (human powered or motorised) which can manœuvre through this great mess of honking cars. And you can walk of course!
Download the zoo map here.
The history of Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre is inextricably linked with that of the conservation of takahē and Elwyn Welch — a local farmer and amateur ornithologist. The takahē being the indigenous bird species that was thought to be extinct and was rediscovered in 1948, while Elwyn Welch was the farmer from Mount Bruce area who was a dedicated amateur ornithologist successfully breeding native bird species, including takahē.
The Pukaha Mount Bruce Forest is a protected Forest Reserve and the last surviving 942 hectares of the ancient Seventy Mile Bush that once stretched from Masterton to central Hawkes Bay area on New Zealand’s North Island. This forest was once a huge green cloak over the landscape, with diverse tree species, including towering rimu, totara and northern rata, as well as many ferns, shrubs, climbers and herbs. Moreover, the forest was alive with the sounds of many different bird species, such as huia, kōkako, saddleback, piopio, kaka and kiwi. But most of the bush was destroyed and converted to farmland.
The forest was acquired by the government in 1867 — bought from the Maori — and the Mount Bruce Forest was reserved and set aside in 1889. The reason for this is not quite clear. Three possibilities have been suggested. It was reserved because (a) it was the last remaining part of the Seventy Mile Bush, or (b) settlers might need a supply for building in later years, or © bird life was an important source of food for the local Maori.
Anyway, some 55 ha of the total 942 ha were further protected as a Native Bird Reserve, administered by the Wildlife Service. A captive-breeding facility for native wildlife was established on these 55 ha, building on local farmer Elwyn Welch’s attempts to rear and breed the rediscovered takahē (which started in 1957), the first species that was introduced to the Reserve. Local man Elwyn Welch became an expert in captive raising of birds, including endangered birds, leading to successes with takahē (Porphyrio hochstetteri) in the 1950s.
The Wildlife Service successfully bred brown teal in 1962, and whio (blue duck) in 1964, but did not succeed in breeding takahē until 1977. In the same decade, a large number of brown teal, buff weka and kakariki were released. The facility was renamed as the National Wildlife Centre (NWC) in 1980. The range of species held at Mount Bruce increased during the 1970s and 1980s, with successful breeding being recorded for North Island saddleback, little spotted kiwi, great spotted kiwi, Antipodes Island parakeet, black stilt, hihi (stitchbird), kereru, North Island kōkako, North Island robin, Auckland Island teal and grand skink.
Since 1981, the NWC at Pukaha Mount Bruce has been jointly managed with the National Wildlife Centre Trust, initially in partnership with the NZ Wildlife Service, and later (since 1987) the Department of Conservation (DOC). This arrangement allowed the DOC to concentrate on captive breeding programmes and the Trust to focus on visitor benefits. A visitor centre complex was built and opened in 1983. Already two years later the nocturnal house for kiwi was built.
During the 1990s and subsequently, the focus of captive breeding at NWC was on breeding threatened species for release as part of national recovery programmes and on development of captive husbandry techniques for species that would require captive-breeding programmes. Major programmes focussed on species such as Campbell Island teal, shore plover, North Island kōkako, hihi and kākā.
Integrated management between the NWC and the adjacent Mount Bruce Scenic Reserve began with the release of captive-reared and translocated kākā in 1996. The successful reintroduction of kākā — a New Zealand’s first — led to the necessity of intensive predator control in the forest, and this was followed by releases of North Island kōkako and North Island brown kiwi from 2003.
In 2001 the entire forest became part of the wildlife reserve, extending the area from 55 to 942 ha, increasing the capacity to breed a variety of native species, including birds of course. About 100 km of footpaths were cut and thousands of traps and bait stations were scattered, setting up an area for wildlife with low predator pressure.
In 2006 the Pukaha Mount Bruce Board has been established, a strong partnership between the Pukaha Mount Bruce Board, Rangitane o Wairarapa and the DOC. In July 2013 the Pukaha Mount Bruce Board took over the operation of the Visitor Centre, education programmes and retail activities from the DOC. In October 2015, it took over the operation of the captive breeding programme from the DOC as well, while the DOC is contracted to undertake the forest restoration programme at Pukaha Mount Bruce on behalf of the Board.
Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre, now a well-respected and successful Reserve, is still situated about two kilometres from ‘Kelvin Grove’, Elwyn Welch’s farm where it all started.
The Centre’s mission
Though not officially called a zoo and not a member of the Zoo and Aquarium Association (ZAA) Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre operates like a regular zoological facility with a mission to conserve and restore wildlife, operates breeding programmes and runs a visitor’s centre focussed on education. Probably the only difference with a regular zoo is their sole focus on native wildlife and tree species. Currently restoration mostly concerns birds, but will expand to bats and reptiles such as the tuatara.
It has established a safe haven for species that once used to thrive in New Zealand. Additionally, the captive-bred individuals are being reintroduced in the wild. Bird releases started in 1996 with nine kākā, the bush parrot. Currently there’s a colony of approximately 160 kākā in the Mount Bruce Forest, and the goal is to establish a population of 600. Furthermore, in 2003 North Island brown kiwi and North Island kōkako were successfully reintroduced to the area. Over 15 kiwi are currently living in the forest and two in the nocturnal house. For the breeding programme, they incubate kiwi eggs to protect chicks and thus give them the chance to become adult.
The Campbell Island teal
The Campbell Island teal captive-breeding programme was notable as being one of the two major components in the successful Campbell Island teal recovery programme, along with the 2001 eradication of Norway rats from 11,300 ha Campbell Island. Captive-bred teal were introduced to Whenua Hou (Codfish Island) in 1999 and 2000, and a mix of captive-bred birds and ‘wild’ birds from Whenua Hou were successfully reintroduced to Campbell Island in 2004⁄06. This resulted in termination of the captive-breeding programme in 2008, which had achieved its main goal.
The Centre runs an extensive education programme called the Learning experiences Outside the Classroom (LEOTC), giving school children the chance to see the kiwi and to learn about environmental problems facing New Zealand.
(Source: Wikipedia; Elwyn Owen Arnold Welch from Teara — the encyclopedia of New Zealand; Department of Conservation — Pukaha Mount Bruce captive management strategic direction 2010 – 2015; website Pukaha Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre; Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre by Colin Scadden, 2000)
On a beautiful Saturday during an excellent late summer period I visit the Pukaha Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre, which above all is a breeding centre for native New Zealand species. Though officially not a zoo it captures several of the essential features you’ll see at respected representatives of the modern zoo community. They keep rare species in captivity, they breed endangered species, they engage in ‘in-situ’ conservation by returning captive-bred species into New Zealand’s wild and they run educational programmes. They even have daily entertainment feeding of kaka, the inquisitive bush parrots, and the long finned eel or tuna, New Zealand’s biggest endemic fish.
Not all species are on display, some of them are only kept for breeding purposes. But you can see conservation in action when experiencing close encounters with some of New Zealand’s most precious and threatened native birds, including stitchbird, kaka and kokako that has been reintroduced in the Mount Bruce Forest — the last remaining remnant of this once majestic forest.
At the Wildlife Centre they keep the following species in aviaries and enclosures: kiwi, kokako, kaka (bush parrot), whio (blue duck), kakariki (yellow and red-crowned and orange-fronted parakeet), hihi (stitchbird), takahe (notornis) and Tuatara — the living fossil. The latter is the only survivor of an extinct group of reptiles that lived during the age of the dinosaurs. Tuatara survived because no predators invaded New Zealand when it separated from Australia about 90 million years ago. They lived throughout the mainland of New Zealand until humans arrived and introduced harmful predators.
After passing through the visitor’s centre you first enter the part with the few enclosures where they keep and breed the endangered species in captivity. Most of the enclosures are well-hidden in the lush vegetation of the forest. The aviaries are not spectacular, but fit-for-purpose and they provide ample space for the birds to fly around. The kiwi house & nursery is a nocturnal house of course, where they have two North Island brown kiwi (Apterix mantelli) on display. One of them is the extraordinary white female kiwi named Manukura. She is not an albino, but her white colour is caused by the rare recessive gene both her parents carry and that results in reduced pigmentation of the feathers making them white — this is known as leucism. This rare trait would have made her an easy target for predators in the wild, standing out in her white plumage at night. She probably would not have lived very long in the wild, and certainly not the age of four she has reached here at the Wildlife Centre.
Besides the modest area where they have enclosures and breeding facilities there is an enormous native forest with several tracks (some even accessible for wheelchairs), of which one is a 2 hour loop walk. Here they reintroduced hihi, kaka and kokako, but other native birds can be seen and heard as well, such as piwakawaka (fantail), riroriro (grey warbler), kereru (native wood pigeon), kotare (kingfisher), pukeko (swamp hen), titipounamu (rifleman), korimako (bellbird), pipiwharauroa (shining cuckoo), tui (parson bird) and weka (woodhen).
The downside of this large natural forest is that it is hard to keep predators out. Predators such as stoats, wildcat and possum that love an easy meal. Therefore there is an extensive anti-predator programme with many volunteers setting traps, placing of bait and checking for predators. The predators that are trapped will be killed.
When you don’t like to do much walking, which I did because I felt a little under the weather, you can always go to the café. It has a good choice of food and beverages, but more importantly it has a terrace with outdoor seating which overlooks the large enclosure with two takahe. Artificially breeding the takahe was more or less the reason why the Wildlife Centre was established in this area in the 1960s, but they have stopped breeding these endangered birds. Still they have two takahe living at the Centre, mostly for educational purposes.
The viewing deck of the café is a place to enjoy your lunch, relax and watch the takahe if they’re out there. But when the free roaming kaka (bush parrots) are fully awake you have to be very alert, because the kaka love to steal some food of your plate. These cheeky birds ‘terrorise’ the terrace (see video), therefore every table is provided with a ‘kaka repellent spray gun’, which is just plain water in a hand sprayer. But it works to keep the birds at a little distance. All this makes it easy to spend a few enjoyable hours on the terrace.
Captive-breeding results
The track record of captive-breeding at the National Wildlife Centre (NWC) is convincingly good when you know that they could terminate several breeding programmes. These programmes were considered completed due to the self-sustaining populations that were achieved after reintroduction of captive-bred individuals. Several major captive breeding programmes have recently been completed at NWC, including termination of the Campbell Island teal and North Island kokako breeding programmes following advice from their respective recovery groups. Captive-reared shore plover, mainly from NWC, were also successfully used to establish a self-sustaining population on an island off the east coast of the North Island following releases during 1998 – 2004. The shore plover captive-breeding for release programme has now shifted focus to Mana Island, with the first birds released in 2007. (Pukaha Mount Bruce captive management Programmes, Miskelly — 2008)
In 1996, nine juvenile kākā were released into the Pukaha Mount Bruce forest, in eastern Wairarapa, from where this North Island sub-species had been absent for nearly 50 years. They were a combination of hand-reared birds from the Pukaha Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre and wild ones from Kapiti Island, near Wellington. This was the first time captive-bred kākā had been released into the wild and the first relocation of wild kākā. The kākā project is part of pioneering species management work at the centre.
When you’re interested in how a North Island kākā sounds like:
(Source: Department of Conservation website)
Conclusion
For a foreigner (or pakahe as they say in New Zealand) visiting from Europe the Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre has many exotic species on display, but that is obviously not their main objective. Their conservation efforts on native New Zealand species only is to be applauded I think, because the population of these indigenous species comprise the total number of these species worldwide. There is no rescue population available outside New Zealand. They have successfully bred several species in captivity and reintroduced them in the wild.
Education is an important part of their mission. They have succeeded in creating a good mix of educational materials addressing children and adults alike at the visitor’s centre, while inviting all to explore the native forest and seek out the many birds.
When having something to drink or eat on the terrace of the café at the Mount Bruce wildlife centre they warn you about the inquisitive Kakas (Nestor meridionalis) that fly around freely in the area. They even put Kaka repellent on the table, that visitors may use to protect themselves from those cheeky birds. Well, they’re right! Even when you are warned they sneak upon you and try to steal your food. Let’s put it like this — those birds keep you busy!
(By the way, the repellent is just plain water in a hand sprayer)
The footage shot in the nocturnal house shows a female North Island brown kiwi (Apterix mantelli), but with a white colour. She is not an albino, she is white because both her parents carry the rare recessive gene that results in reduced pigmentation of the feathers making them white — this is known as leucism. This is quite an extraordinary trait which makes this kiwi a special attraction. She was nearly 4 years old when I visited the wildlife centre. In the wild she would easily be noticed by predators in her white plumage at night, and as a nocturnal species she would never had reached this age without the regular brown camouflage colour.
The takahē (Porphyrio hochstetteri) or notornis is a large, non-passerine, flightless rail (a land-based relative of our familiar coot and moorhen) from New Zealand. Many species similar to this went extinct in the tropical Pacific in the years following first colonisation of their island homes by humans, due to over-hunting and deforestation. The takahē survived because New Zealand is a large, mountainous and wet island, which as a result suffered less deforestation, and had more places for birds to hide from hunters1. Even so, for 50 years it was thought to be extinct until a small population was discovered still alive in 1948 in the remote Murchison Mountains.
It was Geoffrey Orbell, a medical doctor and keen tramper, who rediscovered — together with his three companions — the takahē in Fiordland’s Murchison Mountains on New Zealand’s South Island. At the time it was estimated there could be about 500 birds in that mountain range, but in 1952 when they revisited the area they thought the population size had fallen to about 300 birds. Whatever caused the decrease, for instance competition for food with red deer, it deemed necessary to start a captive breeding programme to save the takahē from the brink of extinction.
In November 1948 New Zealand got its own Lost World story, when a population of takahē — a large flightless rail, long thought extinct — was found in a remote part of Fiordland. The rediscovery of ‘notornis’ (a cousin of the pūkeko), by Southland doctor Geoffrey Orbell, generated international interest. This episode of the National Film Unit’s Weekly Review newsreel series treks from Lake Te Anau high into the Murchison Mountains, where the team (including naturalist Robert Falla) find sea shell fossils, evidence of moa-hunter campsites, and the dodo-like takahē itself:
When the government in 1957 decided to begin a captive breeding programme with the recently rediscovered takahē, the Wildlife Service contacted Elwyn Welch. Welch was one of New Zealand’s leading amateur ornithologists and had practical experience in raising endangered bird species. An extensive plan was developed to bring young chicks out of the Fiordland’s Murchison Mountains on New Zealand’s South Island where the takahē were rediscovered. Welch trained bantam hens to raise pūkeko chicks. The bantams were also trained to sit on eggs no matter what happened. The hens were placed in special nest boxes with dummy eggs and transported around the farm’s premises on the back of a truck, on a tractor or in a rucksack — for the hens to get used to the long and rough trip ahead. In 1958 the bantams were taken to Fiordland. First they collected takahē eggs in the Murchison Mountains, but this wasn’t very successful. So, they decided to seek out chicks instead. They captured four chicks, which the bantams readily mothered. These hens returned as foster-mothers to ‘Kelvin Grove’, Welch’s farm on the North Island with four takahē chicks under their wings. The entire operation was undertaken in absolute secrecy and even got a code-name, Operation Password. Welch and his two assistants, Gordon Williams from the Wildlife Service and Peter Morrison from the National Film Unit, travelled under assumed names, and even when the chicks were safely back at Mount Bruce their exact location was kept secret.
The project was an absolute success, with over 13,000 people visiting Kelvin Grove when the artificially bred takahē were first displayed to the public in 1960. In fact, the number of visitors were so large that the display was closed after only a fortnight.
When takahē were chosen for the captive breeding programme very little was known about the bird’s diet, breeding biology or nesting habits. Achieving success required stamina and many years before pioneering results could be recorded. The lessons learnt told that it was best to try and establish small populations on predator free off-shore islands.
The main captive breeding of takahē is now located at Burwood Bush near Te Anau, close to the Murchison Mountains. This small mountain range, the last refuge of takahē in the wild, still is the only recovery site in the Takahē Recovery Programme. A recovery site is a large area containing the necessities for a natural life — typical takahē habitat, control of introduced predators allowing the bird population to become self-sustaining.
Currently, the takahē pair at Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre are held for educational rather than breeding purposes. But they did save the rare genes of the takahē here at Mount Bruce!
Hunters that don’t see any difference between takahē and pūkeko
A most peculiar and unfortunate thing happened on 17 August 2015 when hunters by mistake shot four takahē. The hunters were contracted by the Department of Conservation (DOC) to carry out a cull of pūkeko, a non-endangered, very common relative of the takahē, on a sanctuary on Motutapu Island in Auckland’s Hauraki Gulf. The cull of pūkeko was organised because of the damage they cause to the nests and eggs of threatened species. The DOC has said that hunters had been carefully briefed on how to differentiate between the species, with takahē about twice the size of pūkeko, and flightless. So, the hunters had also been instructed to only shoot birds on the wing.
1 Duncan et al., 2013. Magnitude and variations of prehistoric bird extinctions in the Pacific. PNAS (doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216511110)
(Source: Wikipedia; Elwyn Owen Arnold Welch from Teara — the encyclopedia of New Zealand; Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre by Colin Scadden, 2000; Takahē recovery website; The Guardian news, 21.05.2016)
Elwyn Owen Arnold Welch was a farmer’s son born in Masterton, New Zealand, on 13 January 1925. The Welch family farmed Kelvin Grove on the northern flanks of Mount Bruce. Elwyn took over Kelvin Grove when his parents shifted to an adjoining property they had recently purchased.
Although Elwyn ran the farm more or less successfully, he preferred to go tramping in the countryside. Birds were his passion, in particular the species he was familiar with from the long walks. And so he became one of New Zealand’s leading amateur ornithologists. By the mid 1950s, having raised grey teal chicks by hand, his practical conservation earned him respect and made him an expert in raising endangered bird species.
When the government in 1957 decided to begin a captive breeding programme with the recently rediscovered takahē, the Wildlife Service contacted Welch. An extensive plan was developed to bring young chicks out of the Fiordland’s Murchison Mountains on New Zealand’s South Island where the takahē were rediscovered. Welch trained bantam hens to raise pūkeko chicks. The bantams were also trained to sit on eggs no matter what happened. The hens were placed in special nest boxes with dummy eggs and transported around the farm’s premises on the back of a truck, on a tractor or in a rucksack — for the hens to get used to the long and rough trip ahead. In 1958 the bantams were taken to Fiordland, and returned as foster-mothers to the North Island with takahē chicks under their wings.
The project was an absolute success, with over 13,000 people visiting Kelvin Grove when the artificially bred takahē were first displayed to the public in 1960. In fact, the number of visitors were so large that the display was closed after only a fortnight. In addition the Wildlife Service initiated a further breeding programme with kākāpō. So, early 1961 a number of birds were captured in Fiordland and taken to Kelvin Grove as well. This attempt failed miserably, mainly because of the lack of information about the kākāpō diet.
Despite his success as an ornithologist, Elwyn Welch felt the call to follow another of his passions. He and his wife Shirley decided to take their children to Nigeria to work for the Sudan Interior Mission. But not before the government, which had been searching for a base to establish a breeding programme for native birds, purchased Kelvin Grove. So, in April 1961 the Welches left for Nigeria. There, they ran a guest house for missionaries based in the interior of the country, as well as undertaking preaching duties. Unfortunately, Elwyn Welch contracted bulbar poliomyelitis, and on 10 December 1961, just seven months after leaving Wairarapa, he died at Jos, Nigeria, aged 36. He was survived by his wife, two daughters and a son.
The Wildlife Service continued the breeding programme at the farm for another two years, but in 1963 it was decided to move to the Mount Bruce Forest Reserve, where the Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre was established.
Elwyn Welch’s contribution to conservation is celebrated in Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre, just two kilometres from Kelvin Grove. He is remembered for both his passions — New Zealand’s avifauna and his firm Christian faith including missionary work.
(Source: Elwyn Owen Arnold Welch from Teara — the encyclopedia of New Zealand; Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre by Colin Scadden, 2000)
The Mount Bruce National Wildlife Centre is located on State Highway 2 between Masterton in the Wairarapa (approximately 30 km) and Eketahuna in the Tararua district (approximately 10 km). This is toward the east coast, on New Zealand’s North Island.
Address:
85379 State Highway 2
5881
Mount Bruce
New Zealand
If you are coming from Wellington, you can take the train to Masterton and then either take a taxi to Pukaha Mount Bruce or use a rental car.
Train timetable is as follows:
Monday to Friday
Depart Wellington 8.25am Arrive Masterton 10.00am
Depart Masterton 3.40pm Arrive Wellington 5.17pm
Saturday, Sunday and Public Holidays
Depart Wellington 9.55am Arrive Masterton 11.30am
Depart Masterton 4.50pm Arrive Wellington 6.25pm
For more details on train timetables and fares, visit www.metlink.org.nz
Tranzit Coachlines operates a bus service from Masterton to Palmerston North and can set down or pick reserved passengers at Pukaha Mount Bruce
Tuesday to Friday
Departs Masterton 9.05am arrives Pukaha Mount Bruce 9.20am (continuing to Palmerston North arriving 11.00am)
Departs Pukaha Mount Bruce 4.25pm arriving Masterton 4.55pm
Reservations are essential please phone 06 3706600 or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
For those cyclists that are addicted to using their bicycle I would say ‘go for it’. It really depends on where you start of course, but you are in for a few kilometres on the road. A road that is being used by heavy traffic as well. It will be a rather flat ride along this part of State Highway 2 with great views on the hilly countryside.
It takes about 2 hours to drive from Wellington and about the same from Napier. It takes approximately 1 hour to drive from Palmerston North. Especially the route from Palmerston North through the Manawatu gorge is very scenic.
There’s free parking available.
Download the zoo map here.
“Tiger map” (CC BY 2.5) by Sanderson et al., 2006.