Co-author, Associate Professor Bryan Fry from the University of Queensland said the Australian and Asian beaked sea snakes were originally thought to be from the same species, however, in comparing their DNA, the research team had found these two snakes were unrelated.
This mix up could have been medically catastrophic, since the CSL* sea snake antivenom is made using the venom from the Asian snake based on the assumption that it was the same species. Luckily, the antivenom is not only very effective against the Australian new species but actually against all sea snakes since they all share a very stream-lined fish-specific venom
(Bryan Fry)Fry said the finding was an example of a situation where two species evolved separately but ended up looking similar, known as the convergent phenotypic evolution phenomenon. Fry added that the ‘beaked’ morphology of the species could be associated with the extremely specialised niche the snakes occupy, even though both species evolved from different ancestors and were not even close relatives. He said the two species occupy the same specialised habitat of silt-filled shallows of tropical estuaries throughout the Asian and Australian regions.
These snakes are responsible for the majority of deaths and injuries to fishermen handling nets in these habitats.
The Asian snake will retain the original name Enhydrina shistosa. The Australian beaked sea snake has been given the scientific name Enhydrina zweifeli, which identifies the region in New Guinea where it is found. The new snake will be placed in a separate genus to the true Enhydrina genus in a follow-up publication that will resolve the complex higher order relationships of sea snakes.
* CSL: CSL Biotherapies, pharmaceutical company
The above news item is reprinted from materials available at The University of Queensland, Australia. Original text may be edited for content and length.
(Source: UQ News, 19.11.2012)