Can tumours teach us about animal evolution on Earth? Researchers believe so and now present a novel hypothesis of why animal diversity increased dramatically on Earth about half a billion years ago. A biological innovation may have been key.
The findings of a transdisciplinary and international team, from Lund University in Sweden and University of Southern Denmark are published online on 18 January in Nature Ecology & Evolution.
The new hypothesis holds that the dramatic diversification of animals resulted from a revolution within the animals’ own biology, rather than in the surrounding chemistry on Earth’s surface.
Life on Earth was dominated by microbes for roughly 4 billion years when multicellular life suddenly — then in the form of animals in robust ecosystems — made a vigorous entry. Why animals diversified so late and so dramatically has remained unresolved and is a matter of hot debate.
The diversification of animals occurred over a geologically short period of time and is known as the. Many geologists have assumed that the Cambrian explosion was triggered by an increase of atmospheric oxygen.
However, a causal relationship between the Cambrian explosion and increasing atmospheric oxygen lacks convincing evidence.
(Source: Shape of Life on Vimeo; see also Cambrian explosion on Shape of Life)
Historic focus on high oxygen
Indeed, research over the last years weaken the support for a correlation between the Cambrian explosion and increasing atmospheric oxygen. For example, dramatic changes in atmospheric oxygen are noted both before and after the Cambrian, but not specifically when animal diversification took off.
Simple animals are furthermore noted to require surprisingly low oxygen levels, which would have been met well before the Cambrian.
“A heated hunt for the geochemical evidence that oxygen increased when animals diversified goes on but, after decades of discussion, it seems worthwhile to consider the development of multicellularity also from other angles”, says geobiologist Emma Hammarlund, PhD and researcher at the division for translational cancer research at Lund University and guest researcher at the Nordic Center for Earth Evolution at the University of Southern Denmark.
Tumours are successful versions of multicellularity, also at low oxygen
In order to understand more about the conditions for multicellular life, Emma Hammarlund contacted tumour biologist, Professor Sven Påhlman at the Department of Laboratory Medicine at Lund University, who has explored the importance of low oxygen concentrations, or so-called hypoxia, in the tumour setting for nearly two decades.
Emma Hammarlund, lead author, Nordic Center for Earth Evolution, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; and Translational Cancer Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
The team, including also tumour biologist Dr. Kristoffer von Stedingk at Lund University’s Paediatrics division, tackled the historic question of why animals developed so late and dramatically with novel clues from the field of tumour biology.
A shared success factor
Specifically, they tested whether the same molecular tools exploited by many tumours — to maintain stem cell properties — could also be relevant to the success of animals in the Cambrian explosion.
Cells with stem cell properties are vital for all multicellular life in order to regenerate tissue. For example, cells in the wall of human small intestine are replaced every 2 – 4 days, through the division of stem cells.
“Hypoxia is generally seen as a threat, but we forget that oxygen shortage in precise periods and settings also is a prerequisite for multicellular life. Our stem cells are the ones that form new tissue, and they are extremely sensitive to oxygen. The stem cells therefore have various systems for dealing with the effects of both oxygen and oxygen shortage, which is clear in the case of tumours”, explains Sven Påhlman.
These systems involve a protein that can ‘fool’ cells act as if the setting was hypoxic. This can also fool cells to get stem cell-like properties.
Tumour cells cope with oxygen
By studying the ability of tumour cells to imitate the properties of stem cells, Sven Påhlman’s team have observed how tumour cells can high-jack specific mechanisms that evade the negative effects that high oxygen has on stem cells. As a consequence, the tumour cells are able to maintain stem cell properties, despite being surrounded by the high oxygen concentrations that are present in the body.
This same ability, according to the authors, is one of the keys that also made animals so successful.
“The ability to construct stem cell properties despite high oxygen levels, so called ‘pseudohypoxia’, is present also in our normal vertebrate tissue. Therefore, we flip the perspective on the oxic setting: While low oxygen is generally unproblematic for animal cells, the oxic settings pose a fundamental challenge for complex multicellularity. Without additional tools, the oxic setting makes tissue-specific stem cells mature too early”, says Sven Påhlman.
A biological revolution
The new hypothesis that gives credit to a biological innovation to have triggered animal diversification is similar to how we think of biological innovations changing life in the past. Just the presence of free oxygen is the result of some microbes finding a way of using sunlight to get energy. This was also a biological event.
A view that fits with other geobiological observations, such that environments with ‘enough’ oxygen have been present on Earth since long before the Cambrian explosion.
The hypothesis also has implications for how animals may have varying capacities to live in oxygenated environments, and perhaps even for how we see cancer as an evolutionary consequence of our ability to live in oxygenated niches.
Bringing geobiology and cancer research together
Taking an evolutionary approach is unusual for cancer researchers, even though the development of tumours is generally seen as an evolutionary process.
Similarly, geobiological research rarely apply the cellular perspective. But having combined their expertise, both Emma Hammarlund and Sven Påhlman are surprised that we have not previously wondered about our paradoxical ability to renew tissue in the oxic setting.
“Surely, many people [who, sic] would intuitively disagree. But once you flip the perspective on the oxic niche and start to consider it as challenging for stem cell properties and tissue renewal, then puzzling observations from distant fields starts to fit together. And you can’t turn back”, concludes Sven Påhlman.
(Source: Lund University press release, 18.01.2018)