Burning coal fuels climate change, causes acid rain, and spreads toxic pollutants into the environment, but now a new Greenpeace report warns that coal may also imperil the world’s biggest feline: the tiger. Home to world’s largest population of tigers — in this case the Bengal subspecies (Panthera tigris tigris) — India is also the world’s third largest coal producer. The country’s rapacious pursuit of coal — it has nearly doubled production since 2007 — has pushed the industry into tiger territory, threatening to destroy forests and fragment the tiger’s already threatened population.
India is one of the bright spots in the global effort to save the tiger from extinction. The country now holds around 1,700 tigers, over half of the world’s population of wild tigers. Although India’s tiger population is generally considered to be in decline, there have been some local population increases giving hope that the country can turn around the situation. Yet the tiger still faces poaching and habitat loss, the latter which is likely to be exacerbated by open pit mining for coal.
The Bengal tiger, which is considered Endangered by the IUCN Red List, is the undisputed king in these forests, which in some cases also sports populations of leopard (Panthera pardus), Near Threatened; Asian elephant (Elephas maximus), Endangered; sloth bear, (Melursus ursinus), Vulnerable; sambar (Rusa unicolor), Vulnerable; and other non-threatened deer and antelope species.
After analysing 13 Central Indian coal mines, in various stages of exploitation, the report finds that full open pit mining in these areas would destroy over a million hectares of forest. According to official data, 18 percent of these forests are known to be used by tigers, 27 percent by leopards, and 5.5 percent by elephants. In all, eight of India’s renowned Tiger Reserves will be impacted, potentially harming around 230 tigers or 13 percent of India’s total tiger population.
“India’s Protected Areas/Tiger Reserves are small by global standards, with few larger than 500 square kilometers. As such, if isolated, their tiger populations are not viable in the long term,” Fernandes explains. “Tigers, males in particular, roam large areas in search of mates, and this ensures genetic vibrancy. As young tigers mature, they also need to establish their own territories, or face conflict with dominant males. Corridors help aid this dispersal and ensure a healthy gene flow between different ‘source’ tiger populations.”
India has signed an ambitious conservation plan (Global Tiger Recovery Program) to double wild tiger populations worldwide by 2022, a plan which was endorsed by all 13 tiger countries in 2010. Worldwide, tigers have been decimated by habitat loss, prey depletion, and hunting, now largely to feed the Chinese medicine trade. The great cats have been left with about 7 percent of their historical range, and already three subspecies have vanished for good.
Coal mining in Central India also raises broader issues beyond wildlife and the effort to save the tiger. India’s natural forests continue to vanish. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), around 19 percent of India is covered in natural forests, excluding monoculture plantations, and many of the remaining forests are degraded and fragmented. Last year the federal government announced a $10.14 billion (460 billion rupees) plan to expand its forests by five million hectares (over 12 million acres), while improving forests quality on another five million hectares. But the state of India’s forests remains complex and generally one of ongoing decline.
The loss of these forest will also impact the livelihoods of local communities, according to the report.
“India’s forest communities rely on a variety of forest produce for their own domestic use and for sale in local markets — honey, fruits, flowers, seeds, bamboo products, firewood. In many areas, the forest doesn’t just supplement other incomes, it is the main income,” Fernandes says, adding that forest loss in one area may result in ongoing pressure elsewhere. “When a forest is lost to a coal mine, the community that depended on it is forced to migrate in search of other options — usually casual labour, if available, or move closer to another forest area, increasing the human pressure on remnant forests.”
India’s fixation on coal is also having climatic impacts. Today, India is the world’s third largest emitter of greenhouse gases largely due to its dependence on coal. Last year, India’s carbon emissions jumped 6 percent, while emissions fell around 2 percent in the U.S. and around 3 percent in Europe. At climate negotiations India has argued, rightly, that from a historical perspective its responsibility is far lower than that of Europe’s or the U.S.‘s In addition, India’s emissions per person still remains far below those of wealthier countries. Still, its hard to see how global greenhouse gas emissions will begin dropping soon — as scientists say it must to avoid dangerous climate change — if both India and China, whose emissions rose 9 percent last year, refuse to look at energy sources beyond coal in the near-term.
In its report, Greenpeace argues that it’s time for India to make a rapid transition to wind and solar energy. “In some parts of India, wind energy is already on par with grid power,” Fernandes says. Such a transition would also relieve the nation’s dependence on a grid system full of problems, since solar and wind can provide power without connecting to the grid. This week India made international news when its grid failed twice, leaving 700 million people without power.
“For thousands of [remote] villages, the cost per unit of most forms of renewable energy at current rates is considerably less than the cost of grid-connected electricity,” reads the report. Despite the climate, social, and wildlife hazards of India’s coal boom, the country has no plans to slow coal production. According to the report, the government plans to increase domestic coal production 41 percent by 2017 from last year’s levels.
“The Indian government is wary of reducing its own coal use when it doesn’t see these countries (the U.S., Canada, etc.) fulfilling their greater responsibility,” Fernandes explains, but describes this strategy as “myopic.”
The above news item is reprinted from materials available at Mongabay. Original text may be edited for content and length.
(Source: Mongabay, 01.08.2012)
