Moos’ selection of recent publications about zoos, biodiversity and evolution
y personal attempt to try and convince everybody of the beauty and the importance of nature as (evolutionary) phenomenon, especially its fauna. Information is given, in text and image, on my ‘beasts’. Cats, especially big ones, will be starring next to other predators. And if possible my all time favourite the cow will make its appearance. But above all I would like to stress and show, as a one-man-pressure-group, the importance of the diversity of life on our earth. As the uncomplicated beauty of animals provides a lot of pleasure to those who appreciate it. More species mean more pleasure. To prevent species from going extinct at the rate we see today is therefore paramount. Not only for esthetic reasons, but also for the preservation of life on earth. Because to me, loss of biodiversity is inseparable connected to a deteriorating environment on earth. Mother Earth whom is less and less capable of sustaining life. Zoos will become more important for conservation of fauna diversity, which I would like to show also. As a matter of fact, I started the endeavour with launching a website (moosmood.com) focussing on this plethora of issues around 2008. It turned out that picking up where I left years ago, visiting zoos and see what kind of progress was being made in keeping animals in captivity, fitted nicely into my new challenge. So, more and more time is consumed with visiting zoos and reviewing their efforts to save endangered species. Genesis and extinction are an inextricable couple that seems off balance. Let us try and restore this balance!
(John Seidensticker)
ature’s diversity should be admired and enjoyed instead of destroyed. Destruction of your own habitat is like committing suicide. There is ample evidence that substantial biological diversity keeps an ecosystem healthy, or even stronger: is necessary to let the ecosystems provide their services. Now and again a new species is discovered (which is not the same as evolved), but the species extinction rate has never been so high. This leads to an enormous biodiversity loss of which the consequences will be devastating when irreversible. An increase of new species and loss of other species is inseparabe from the evolutionary cycle, but when the ratio is off balance changes will take place. Of course the global loss of biodiversity is important, but the local diversity of flora and fauna is what really counts. On a local scale flora and fauna together form an ecosystem. So, disturbances on a local scale will affect the ecosystem and its services, like (clean) water, food (nutrient balance), medicine and diseases. This will be noticeable not only for researchers but also for the general public.
So, what drives species to extinction? There seems to be consensus regarding climate change, international trade, long distance transport of products and animals, human travel, land use and urbanisation being the main driving forces for the current observed biodiversity loss. All in all this makes man the cause of the high rate of species extinction. This is not being done on purpose, but out of ignorance. At least that is what I hope, and which makes the current biodiversity loss collateral damage. Unforeseen, but nevertheless substantial and possibly devastating.
People should be made aware of this black future that will become reality if we do not stop this uncontrolled negative influence on nature and its biological diversity. Therefore I plead for moral and financial support for those people and organisations, including non-governmental, that are trying to raise this awareness and do something to reduce the loss of biological diversity. For instance organisations involved in nature and wildlife conservation, climate change reduction, and campaigns against environmental pollution.
Statements like the following, displayed in the American Museum of Natural History in New York, could raise this awareness:
Human health & Biodiversity: The disruption of ecosystems adversely affects food supplies and water quality and quantity. Damage to ecosystems can cause changes in disease ecology, leading to the emergence of rare and unknown diseases or the resurgence of diseases that were previously controlled. Lost species means lost raw materials for present and potential pharmaceuticals and alternative therapies. Also lost are models through which we learn about human physiology and organisms whose study allows us to make predictions about the agents and carriers of disease. We lose future raw materials for new processes and products of biotechnology, many of which are critical to understanding, preventing and curing diseases. We lose indicators of the ability of ecosystems to support life of all kinds including human life. Finally, living in a world lacking the beauty and tranquillity inherent in diverse intact ecosystems has profound effect on our mental health.
Otherwise the message of Eric Chivian in this video should do the trick:
Dr. Eric Chivian, Director of the Center for Health and the Global Environment, Harvard Medical School, explains how polar bears offer us the opportunity to unlock some medical mysteries but we must do so before polar bears are gone forever or take steps quickly to ensure their survival. Studying polar bears in the wild has the potential to unlock medical secrets related to osteoporosis, kidney disease and renal failure, and obesity.
(Source: CENTER for HEALTH and the GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT, Harvard Medical School)
Or perhaps this might help:
s long as can be remembered (exotic) animals have been collected to satisfy man’s curiosity for beautiful, dangerous, extraordinary, and human-like creatures of the animal kingdom. At first it were the world’s rulers who, using their power and authority, collected animals and established menageries, either by having the animals sent from occupied territories or by receiving animals as gifts in return for favours. Later, the rich and wealthy could afford to establish menageries of exotic animals, collected by eccentric explorers, for their own pleasure. Occasionally the naïve citizens were allowed to view these collections. Fortunately, this gradually changed when travelling menageries came into existence and zoos were founded which allowed the common people to visit their grounds. At first one day or morning a week, Sundays for instance, but soon this was increased until the animals were on display for everyone, year-round.
Next, came the understanding that animal welfare was impaired when animals were housed alone in small cages, and continuation of wild catch of endangered species would be counterproductive in the end. This caused a shift in zoo policy worldwide, knowing that breeding success of endangered species in zoos relied on good animal husbandry systems and that diversity of animals in the wild was at stake. Maintaining the diversity of the animal kingdom became the main driver for many zoos and a requirement to be member of a continental or global zoo organisation (WAZA). Therefore, their mission is focused on sustainability in general, leading to objectives concerning welfare and care of animals, biodiversity conservation, environmental education and global sustainability.
This can be recognised in changes made in the management of modern zoos. The animals are offered an environment which is more or less similar to their natural environment, particularly to allow development and expression of natural behaviour. The result lead to enclosures that provide animals the opportunity to isolate themselves or hide, which is natural behaviour too and makes them less visible sometimes. This requires understanding of the public that primarily come to see the animals, and therefore needs explanation, guidance or a different approach. After all, visitors bring in the ever so needed money, thus a decreasing number of visitors is undesirable. Careful balancing between these two “benefits” is therefore essential.
In the field of biodiversity conservation, the zoo puts on a fight against the extinction of species based on two pillars. Conservation of species on a quantitative and qualitative level, and education of the public about the depletion of mother earth and its consequences. The latter is often enthusiastically addressed with various educational programs, and information points in the zoos with volunteers as staff. A few decades ago people realised that contribution of zoos to the conservation of species would only be effective if international cooperation between zoos could be established. The ‘law of large[r] numbers’ plays a significant role on gene, race and species level. Inbreeding, and thus the appearance of hereditary problems, should be avoided as much as possible. Therefore, targeted breeding programs are developed which are centrally managed and directed, and make use of the gene pool of as many zoos as possible. In Europe this has led to the European Endangered Species Programmes (EEP) and the European Stud Books (ESB). The management thereof is appointed, per species, to a specialised zoo and a dedicated employee who bears the responsibility for this task. He or she plays an important role in the maintenance of the collective species population in zoos, and possibly in the wild. For several species programs are developed to try and return “artificially” (ex situ) bred animals to their natural habitat in the wild.
Finally, it is worth mentioning that many reputable zoos fund research and implement it on location for better understanding of the causes and consequences of the degradation of natural habitats on wildlife populations throughout the world, with the ultimate goal to preserve the species.
The World of Zoos
My personal visualised view about the importance of Zoos and the justification for their existence, provided they are member of the World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA) or one of the regional organisations, such as EAZA and AZA, can be seen here:
* | There still exist a lot of misconceptions and misunderstandings concerning the aspiration of zoos and the justification for their existence. To achieve a better notion, the plea of Brian Bertram is highly recommended. |
“Tiger map” (CC BY 2.5) by Sanderson et al., 2006.