201530Oct21:54

Evo­lu­tion can hap­pen much faster than thought, chicken study reveals

Infor­ma­tion
pub­lished 30 Octo­ber 2015 | mod­i­fied 30 Octo­ber 2015
Archived

White plymouth rock chickensA new study of chick­ens over­turns the pop­u­lar assump­tion that evo­lu­tion is only vis­i­ble over long time scales. By study­ing indi­vid­ual chick­ens that were part of a long-​term pedi­gree, the sci­en­tists led by Pro­fes­sor Greger Lar­son at Oxford University’s Research Lab­o­ra­tory for Archae­ol­ogy, found two muta­tions that had occurred in the mito­chon­dr­ial genomes of the birds in only 50 years. For a long time sci­en­tists have believed that the rate of change in the mito­chon­dr­ial genome was never faster than about 2% per mil­lion years. The iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of these muta­tions shows that the rate of evo­lu­tion in this pedi­gree is in fact 15 times faster. In addi­tion, by deter­min­ing the genetic sequences along the pedi­gree, the team also dis­cov­ered a sin­gle instance of mito­chon­dr­ial DNA being passed down from a father. This is a sur­pris­ing dis­cov­ery, show­ing that so-​called ‘pater­nal leak­age’ is not as rare as pre­vi­ously believed. The find­ings are pub­lished on 28 Octo­ber in the online early ver­sion of the jour­nal, Biol­ogy Letters.

Using a well-​documented 50-​year pedi­gree of a pop­u­la­tion of White Ply­mouth Rock chick­ens devel­oped at Vir­ginia Tech by Pro­fes­sor Paul Siegel, the researchers recon­structed how the mito­chon­dr­ial DNA passed from moth­ers to daugh­ters within the pop­u­la­tion. They did this by analysing DNA from the blood sam­ples of 12 chick­ens of the same gen­er­a­tion using the most dis­tantly related mater­nal lines, know­ing that the base pop­u­la­tion had started from seven par­tially inbred lines. A selec­tive mat­ing approach within the pop­u­la­tion started in 1957, result­ing in what is now an over ten­fold dif­fer­ence in the size of the chick­ens in the two groups when weighed at 56 days old.

Our study shows that evo­lu­tion can move much faster in the short term than we had believed from fossil-​based estimates
Greger Lar­son, senior author, Palaeoge­nomics and Bio-​Archaeology Research Net­work, Research Lab­o­ra­tory for Archae­ol­ogy, Oxford University »

Pro­fes­sor Lar­son said: ‘Our obser­va­tions reveal that evo­lu­tion is always mov­ing quickly but we tend not to see it because we typ­i­cally mea­sure it over longer time peri­ods. Our study shows that evo­lu­tion can move much faster in the short term than we had believed from fossil-​based esti­mates. Pre­vi­ously, esti­mates put the rate of change in a mito­chon­dr­ial genome at about 2% per mil­lion years. At this pace, we should not have been able to spot a sin­gle muta­tion in just 50 years, but in fact we spot­ted two.’

The paper says there is now con­sid­er­able evi­dence of a dis­par­ity between long-​term and short-​term esti­mates of mito­chon­dr­ial changes. One the­ory put for­ward in recent stud­ies is that mito­chon­dr­ial DNA evolves ‘non-​neutrally’, that there is a puri­fy­ing selec­tion process and neg­a­tive muta­tions are removed more quickly, result­ing in the impres­sion of a short-​term ele­va­tion in rates. There have been few stud­ies of short-​term mito­chon­dr­ial evo­lu­tion, includ­ing both muta­tion rates and pater­nal leak­age. There is now direct evi­dence that it is not always inher­ited from the mother.

Study lead author Dr Michelle Alexan­der, from the Uni­ver­sity of York, said: ‘The one thing every­one knew about mito­chon­dria is that it is almost exclu­sively passed down the mater­nal line, but we iden­ti­fied chicks who inher­ited their mito­chon­dria from their father, mean­ing so-​called ‘pater­nal leak­age’ can hap­pen in avian pop­u­la­tions. Both of these find­ings demon­strate the speed and dynamism of evo­lu­tion when observed over short time periods.’


(Source: Uni­ver­sity of Oxford news release, 28.10.2015)


Goal: 7000 tigers in the wild

Tiger range countries map

Tiger map” (CC BY 2.5) by Sander­son et al., 2006.

about zoos and their mis­sion regard­ing breed­ing endan­gered species, nature con­ser­va­tion, bio­di­ver­sity and edu­ca­tion, which of course relates to the evo­lu­tion of species.
Fol­low me on: